arXiv Machine Learning
Alert: Learning Trigger Functions for Early Classification of Time Series using Deep-RL
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 11
Time-Series Foundation Model Embeddings for Remaining Useful Life Estimation
arXiv:2606. 11990v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction is essential for industrial predictive maintenance, yet many learning-based approaches rely on extensive feature engineering or large labeled datasets to train task-specific sequence models.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 20
SC-JEPA: Stabilizing Latent Predictive Learning for Time-Series Anomaly Prediction
arXiv:2602. 04643v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Time-series anomaly prediction aims to forecast future system failures before they fully emerge, making latent predictive models such as JEPA a promising framework for capturing precursor dynamics.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20
End-to-end Early Classification of Time Series in Non-Stationary Environments
Early Classification of Time Series (ECTS) requires making accurate decisions as early as possible in inherently online and evolving environments. Yet, most existing methods assume stationarity and rely on separable designs, where classification and triggering are optimized independently, an assumption that fundamentally limits their adaptability under drift.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11
CaReTS: A Multi-Task Framework Unifying Classification and Regression for Time Series Forecasting
arXiv:2511. 09789v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in deep forecasting models have achieved remarkable performance, yet most approaches still struggle to provide both accurate predictions and interpretable insights into temporal dynamics.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2
Amortized Predictability-aware Training Framework for Time Series Forecasting and Classification
arXiv:2602. 16224v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Time series data are prone to noise in various domains, and training samples may contain low-predictability patterns that deviate from the normal data distribution, leading to training instability or convergence to poor local minima.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16
David vs. Goliath in Next Activity Prediction: Argmax vs. LSTM, Transformer, and LLM
arXiv:2606. 15868v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Next activity prediction (NAP) is a cornerstone of predictive process monitoring (PPM), enabling organizations to move from retrospective analysis to proactive process steering.