arXiv AI
Ajar: Measuring Open Privilege in Agent Defenses
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 1
Reachability-Based Capability Confinement for LLM Agents under Indirect Prompt Injection
arXiv:2608.30041v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model agents place outputs from external skills into their execution context, allowing attacker-controlled data to influence later pri...
arXiv AI
Jun 17
Breaking the Code: Security Assessment of AI Code Agents Through Systematic Jailbreaking Attacks
arXiv:2510. 01359v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code-capable large language model (LLM) agents are embedded in software engineering workflows where they can read, write, and execute code, raising "jailbreak" stakes beyond text-only settings.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
SecureClaw: Clawing Back Control of LLM Agents
arXiv:2606. 09549v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using large language model (LLM) agents face two distinct security failures: unauthorized external actions and exposure of sensitive plaintext inside the runtime before any final output check can intervene.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
Understanding and Evaluating Claw-like Agent Security Through a Computer-Systems Lens
arXiv:2606. 30755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Claw-like AI agents (e.
arXiv AI
Oct 7
APEX: Active Protection at Execution Boundaries for LLM Agents
The paper introduces APEX, an active defense for large language model agents that protects against indirect prompt injection by enforcing safety at execution boundaries. APEX uses an evidence‑gated prevention contract and deception‑based exposure to ensure that only authorized effects, endorsed by the task, are executed. Evaluation shows APEX achieves near‑zero attack success across multiple benchmarks and capability‑unit types, outperforming 13 baseline defenses.
arXiv AI
Aug 20
Task-Conditioned Least-Privilege Learning for Executable Terminal and MCP Agents
The paper introduces a post‑training framework that teaches a 4B‑parameter language model to exercise task‑conditioned authority in executable terminal and Model Context Protocol (MCP) environments. By auditing each action across six risk dimensions with deterministic verifiers and optimizing for task‑specific excess‑privilege values, the authors achieve 98.48% safe success and reduce excess‑authority errors from 4.56% to 0.79% on held‑out tasks. The study also demonstrates capability retention, prompt‑directed improvement, and generalization over a 400‑task continuation test.