arXiv:2606. 08367v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Most evaluations of LLM agents look like exams: a discrete task, a clean environment, a score in minutes or hours.
By Deepak Akkil, Ravi Kokku, Karthik Vikram, Tamer Abuelsaad, Aditya Vempaty, Satya Nitta
arXiv:2608. 06020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Economic World Models (EWMs) are generative economic models that simulate how economies evolve from within by modeling heterogeneous agents, their beliefs and actions, and the market and institutional mechanisms through which their interactions produce aggregate outcomes.
By Jiale Han, Xiang Li, Jing Qian, Wenyuan Gu, Pin Gao, Ye Luo, Hongyuan Zha, Dacheng Tao, Benyou Wang, Lin William Cong
arXiv:2609.24911v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Social simulation offers the social sciences an experimental instrument that the real world cannot supply, and generative agents have transformed it by...
By Xinnong Zhang, Jiayu Lin, Jia Wang, Yixu Huang, Xinyi Mou, Yingqian Wu, Jingcong Liang, Shijun Lei, Jianing Shi, Guanying Li, Siyuan Wang, Hanjia Lyu, Zhenfei Yin, Yunlu Yin, Siming Chen, Yulan He, Jiebo Luo, Xuanjing Huang, Liyin Jin, Baohua Zhou, Hanqi Yan, Zhongyu Wei
The paper introduces Imagine-then-Plan (ITP), a framework that lets agents learn by interacting with a learned world model to generate multi-step imagined trajectories. ITP features an adaptive lookahead mechanism that balances ultimate goals with task progress, producing richer signals about future outcomes. Experiments on various benchmarks show that ITP outperforms existing baselines, and analyses suggest the adaptive lookahead improves reasoning for complex tasks.
By Youwei Liu, Jian Wang, Hanlin Wang, Beichen Guo, Wenjie Li
Social simulation offers the social sciences an experimental instrument that the real world cannot supply, and generative agents have transformed it by acting as silicon samples that unite agent-based...
Agent0 is a fully autonomous framework that enables large language model agents to evolve without external data by using a multi‑step co‑evolution process. It pits a curriculum agent against an executor agent, both derived from the same base LLM, where the curriculum agent creates increasingly challenging tasks and the executor learns to solve them. By integrating external tools into the executor’s workflow, the system creates a self‑reinforcing cycle that continuously generates high‑quality curricula, leading to significant gains in reasoning performance—an 18% improvement on mathematical reasoning and 24% on general reasoning for the Qwen3‑8B‑Base model.
By Peng Xia, Kaide Zeng, Jiaqi Liu, Can Qin, Fang Wu, Yiyang Zhou, Caiming Xiong, Huaxiu Yao