arXiv AI By Calvin Yeung, Keisuke Fujii

AI Soccer Analyst: Stage-Aware and Verifiable Human-AI Collaboration for Soccer Data Analysis

Read the original on arXiv AI →

AI Soccer Analyst is a mixed‑initiative system that guides analysts through six revisable stages—Data Understanding, Problem Definition, Structured Planning, Execution, Evidence‑Grounded Reporting, and Interaction and Refinement—to produce soccer data analyses. A formative study with five analysts shaped design goals around automation, verifiability, human control, and accessibility, while a task‑based evaluation with 16 participants showed that 33 of 48 tasks met completion criteria and participants reported high quality, reliability, and verifiability of outputs. Interaction logs revealed that domain knowledge emerged during clarification, planning, and refinement, demonstrating that stage‑aware human‑AI collaboration can produce inspectable, revisable, and verifiable analyses while keeping domain experts in control.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 21

FST.ai 2.5: Explainable and Uncertainty-Aware AI for Olympic and Para-Taekwondo Decision Support, Athlete Digital Twins, and Federation-Scale Analytics

arXiv:2607. 16597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid digitalisation of elite sport has created new opportunities for integrating artificial intelligence (AI), performance analytics, and decision-support systems into athlete development and competition management.

By Keivan Shariatmadar, Ahmad Osman, Ramin Rey
arXiv AI
Sep 17

What Counts as Strategic Reasoning? A Systematic Mapping of Chess Research on Humans, Engines, and Language Models

The paper presents a systematic mapping of recent chess research involving humans, engines, neural and reinforcement‑learning systems, large language models (LLMs), and hybrid approaches. It identifies 84 core study families and classifies them by agent type, strategic‑reasoning stages, and evaluation dimensions, highlighting a strong focus on situation assessment, evaluation, and action selection while noting gaps in planning, explanation, metacognition, and human–AI collaboration. The study also distinguishes hybrid systems by integration timing and cautions that improved human performance in evaluations does not automatically imply human–AI synergy.

By Paolo Ciancarini, Remo Pareschi