arXiv:2610.20055v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The rapid advancement of large vision language models (LVLMs) has made geolocation inference from images highly accurate and accessible. This poses ser...
By Yixin Wu, Mingjie Li, Yun Shen, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang
arXiv:2609.21363v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Multimodal large reasoning models (MLRMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex visual understanding. However, this very power introdu...
By Yining Wang, Xi Li, Mi Zhang, Xiaohan Zhang, Xiaoyu You, Zhenxing Qian, Mi Wen
arXiv:2610.27323v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) can infer sensitive information such as geolocation from subtle visual cues, creating privacy risks when responses disc...
By Wenyue Chen, Yuhan Cheng, Ruixin Yang, Ethan Mendes, Alan Ritter, Jingwei Sun, Hai Li, Yiran Chen
arXiv:2503.00610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Understanding how people perceive urban environments is essential for inclusive planning, yet conventional surveys are costly and difficult t...
By Ciro Beneduce, Bruno Lepri, Massimiliano Luca
GTPred is a new benchmark for geo‑temporal prediction that evaluates multi‑modal large language models (MLLMs) on 370 images taken across 120 years worldwide. It assesses predictions by matching both the year and a hierarchical location sequence, and includes annotated reasoning chains to test intermediate reasoning. Experiments on 15 MLLMs show that while visual perception is strong, models still lack world knowledge and geo‑temporal reasoning, and that adding temporal data improves location inference.
By Jinnao Li, Tingzhu Chen, Changbo Wang
The paper investigates whether large, instruction‑following Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) can reliably perform zero‑shot image privacy classification. It compares three open‑source VLMs to specialized privacy models on two public benchmarks, evaluating accuracy, robustness to image degradations (compression, lighting changes, noise), inference speed, and parameter count. The findings show that while VLMs remain robust to perturbations, they are less accurate and significantly slower than smaller, purpose‑built privacy models, indicating that scaling alone does not guarantee effective privacy classification.
By Alina Elena Baia, Alessio Xompero, Andrea Cavallaro