arXiv AI By Wenxin Jiang, Xuyang Wang, Yuxiao Wu

AI Contextual Measurement for Recovering Individual and Group-Level Effects: Validation Against Survey Measures and an Occupational Application

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces AICOME, a framework that uses AI-derived respondent-level measures to recover both individual and group-level effects in contextual models. By applying AICOME to the 2022 China Family Panel Studies, the authors validate that AI measures can replicate key survey variables such as computer use, foreign-language use, weekly hours, and management responsibilities, especially when rich respondent and job data are available. The study also identifies boundary conditions, noting reduced performance when only occupation and basic demographics are used or when multiple related constructs are simultaneously unobserved.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

Debiased Inference for AI-Generated Data without Gold-Standard Labels: Identification via Multiple Imperfect Measurements

The paper introduces Debiased Inference with Multiple Imperfect Measurements (DMM), a framework that uses several error‑prone AI measurements to perform valid downstream statistical inference without requiring costly gold‑standard labels. By assuming conditional independence of the measurements given the true label and unit‑level features, DMM leverages CP decomposition and semiparametric theory to prove consistency and asymptotic normality of its estimator. Simulations demonstrate that DMM yields valid inference and can improve efficiency when additional imperfect measurements are available, and the authors provide diagnostics for the key independence assumption.

By Naoki Egami, Sooahn Shin