arXiv AI
AgentStripes: An Evidence-Graded Maturity Model for AI Agents
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 11
AgentAudit: An Open, Extensible Framework for Full-Lifecycle Trust Evaluation of AI Agents
AgentAudit is an open, extensible framework that evaluates the full lifecycle of AI agents, assessing planning, tool selection, execution, memory, and reasoning across ten dimensions such as instruction integrity, security, and alignment. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on single aspects, AgentAudit analyzes the entire execution trace to attribute failures to specific stages. The framework was tested on five large language models, revealing significant differences in trustworthiness even among models with similar task‑completion performance.
arXiv AI
Sep 21
EnterpriseVal: Quantifying the Efficacy, Reliability and Value of Generative AI in the Enterprise
arXiv:2609.21841v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier language models now produce professional deliverables that expert graders judge to match human work on a substantial share of economically val...
arXiv AI
Aug 5
Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation
arXiv:2608. 00794v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic AI evaluation pipelines produce benchmark scores that justify deployment decisions, safety certifications, and regulatory compliance claims.
arXiv AI
Oct 31
Agentic process evidence
The article discusses how AI agents are transforming software development by autonomously creating pull requests, selecting dependencies, refactoring code, interpreting test failures, and managing infrastructure across the SDLC. It highlights the lack of accountability for these transient processes, noting that traditional tools like git logs and governance frameworks assume human decision‑making, which no longer applies. To address this, the authors propose Agentic Process Evidence (APE), a signed, tamper‑evident, machine‑readable attestation that links AI agent sessions to their outcomes, enabling policy‑as‑code controls and human oversight only when necessary.
arXiv AI
Jul 21
AEVAL: From Anecdotal to Deterministic Testing for Agentic Skill Workflows
arXiv:2607. 16345v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern agentic systems increasingly rely on skills: installable packages of natural language and code that teach an LLM agent to perform a domain task.
arXiv AI
Oct 7
EIO-Agents: The Missing Semantic Layer for AI Agent Evaluation
EIO-Agents introduces an open specification for interoperable AI agent evaluation, consisting of two layers: the Evaluation Intelligence Ontology (EIO) and the Portable Evaluation Record (PER). The EIO layer supplies a semantic framework that defines typed evidence, behavioral predicates, evidence contracts, claims, witness rules, proof status, recurrence, and computable derivations for metrics, findings, controls, and decisions such as PASS, REVIEW, or BLOCK. The PER layer offers a canonical, content‑addressed record of an evaluation that preserves the evidence‑to‑decision chain, enabling re‑derivation, explanation, and verification of the evaluation outcome.