arXiv AI By Chirag Sharma, Benjamin Fowlersmith, Karime Maamari

AgentMemGate: Addressing Speculation Contamination in Conversational Assistant Memory

Read the original on arXiv AI →

AgentMemGate is a write-time gate for conversational AI assistants that prevents speculation contamination in long‑term memory by classifying extracted statements as speculation, completed event, correction, or other. Speculations are kept outside memory until conditions allow promotion or deletion. The approach eliminates observed contamination and improves task accuracy from 65% to 95% on core benchmarks, with further gains on a harder held‑out set.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

UTILMEM: Benchmarking Evidence Utilization in Long-Term Conversational Memory

UTILMEM is a new diagnostic benchmark that tests how conversational agents use long‑term memory, focusing on reasoning over dense histories, spotting implicitly relevant memories, synthesizing distributed evidence, and resisting interference from similar distractors. It contains 1,717 instances across five domains and evaluates a range of retrieval‑based and memory‑augmented systems. The study shows that strong performance on traditional factual recall does not guarantee effective memory utilization, highlighting a gap between retrieving information and integrating it into coherent, task‑oriented outputs.

By Peijun Qing, Fobo Shi, Soroush Vosoughi
arXiv AI
5d ago

Gated Memory: Admission-Controlled Memory Formation for Conversational AI

The paper introduces Gated Memory, a framework for improving how conversational AI systems form long‑term memory. It adds two checkpoints before facts are stored: an admission gate that checks each candidate fact against the full utterance context, and a conditional enrichment stage that tags facts with provenance, scope, and time/place grounding. On the LoCoMo‑10 benchmark, Gated Memory improves LLM‑judge accuracy by 2.6% relative to a strong baseline.

By Preeti Saraswat, Divya Neelagiri, Ajay Manoj
arXiv AI
Sep 10

When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents

The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.

By Shweta Mishra, Shashank Mishra