arXiv AI
Agentic4PDM: Host-Governed Evidence Admissibility for Industrial Fault Diagnosis
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Physically Verifiable Evidence and LLM-Based Reporting for Bearing Fault Diagnosis
arXiv:2607. 22797v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Trustworthy deployment of AI-based diagnosis in safety-critical mechanical systems hinges on validation: whether a prediction can be checked against physical reality before it is acted upon.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Monitoring Agentic Systems Before They're Reliable
arXiv:2606. 02494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic systems entering production typically operate as partially integrated assemblies where structural defects, not task-level errors, dominate the failure landscape.
arXiv AI
Sep 25
A Multi-level Information Integration Framework for Physically Verifiable Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery
The paper proposes a Diagnostic Evidence Network (DENet) that augments traditional fault‑diagnosis outputs with structured evidence, including classification, predicted characteristic frequency, and temporal localization of impulses. This evidence aligns with theoretical bearing physics and can be validated at inference time, achieving high AUROC for misclassification detection without sacrificing accuracy. A QLoRA‑adapted language model then translates DENet’s evidence into maintenance reports, markedly reducing unsupported claims.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 1
Monitoring Agentic Systems Before They're Reliable
Agentic systems entering production typically operate as partially integrated assemblies where structural defects, not task-level errors, dominate the failure landscape. At this maturity level, task-level error detection may be infeasible: structural failure modes mask the signal that task-level monitors are designed to detect.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
When Agentic Executions Fail: Detecting and Localizing Runtime Faults from Telemetry
arXiv:2608. 14680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliability in LLM-based agentic systems is a property of the whole execution (its tool calls, model calls, guardrails, and inter-agent messages), not of the final answer alone, yet evaluating only task outcomes reveals little about how or why a run fails.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems
arXiv:2607. 29405v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI systems act through multi-step trajectories that combine planning, tool use, memory, interaction, and adaptation.