← Back to all news
arXiv Machine Learning By Euijin Hong, Guannan Qu

Activation-Keyed Momentum: An Anisotropic Momentum Update via the Delta Rule

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces Activation-Keyed Momentum (AK‑Momentum), a momentum update that uses the input activation of a linear layer as a key to apply a delta‑rule update, allowing each direction to decay at a rate proportional to its frequency of appearance. AK‑Momentum is proven to be a valid momentum, incorporates input‑side curvature correction without matrix inversion, and clears stale directions faster than traditional exponential moving average (EMA) under both fixed and drifting optima. It can replace the momentum buffer of any optimizer, scales with width under μP, adds only 22–25% extra compute, and demonstrates significant step‑count reductions in FineWeb‑Edu pretraining and other benchmarks. whyItMatters":"AK‑Momentum offers a principled, efficient way to adapt momentum decay to anisotropic training dynamics, improving convergence speed and stability across a range of models and datasets."

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Aug 25

A Physical Response-and-Memory Model for Muon Optimization

The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.

By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
llmsbenchmarkssafety
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

Gradient-Update Mismatch: Rethinking Conflict-Free Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

The paper identifies a problem called Gradient-Update Mismatch (GUM), where optimizers can alter conflict-free gradient directions produced by gradient surgery, leading to conflicts between physics residual and boundary condition losses in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). To address this, the authors propose Gradient-Update Alignment (GUA), which projects the optimizer’s update onto the conflict-free cone and adjusts internal optimizer state accordingly. Experiments show GUM is common across many optimizers, and GUA consistently eliminates conflicts and significantly reduces error in PINN training.

By Jing Xiao, Xinhai Chen, Qinglin Wang, Menghan Jia, Zhiquan Lai, Dongsheng Li, Jie Liu, Tiejun Li
safety
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Optimizer Memory Schedules for Outscaling the Overtraining Axis

The paper studies how different optimizers perform as training duration (overtraining) increases, focusing on matrix‑preconditioned methods (Muon, SOAP) and a momentum‑scheduled method (ADANA) compared to AdamW. Across models ranging from 51M to 253M parameters and overtraining factors up to 256×, the authors find that optimal learning‑rate schedules, weight‑decay coefficients, and memory settings shift with horizon, and that ADANA consistently outperforms AdamW, especially with log‑time weight decay and momentum cooldown. Muon and SOAP maintain roughly constant token‑efficiency advantages, with SOAP potentially improving at the highest overtraining levels.

By Katie Everett, Shikai Qiu
More like this →