arXiv:2607. 02633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present GRAFT, a per-word pronunciation conditioning mechanism for text-to-speech neural codec language modeling.
By Antonis Asonitis, Francesco Verdini, Aref Farhadipour, Vijeta Avijeet, Pierre-Edouard Honnet, Marzieh Razavi, Juan Pablo Zuluaga Gomez
Recent advances in zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) have substantially improved speech quality and voice cloning fidelity. However, many zero-shot TTS systems still depend on audio prompt transcripts at inference time.
arXiv:2609.14817v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In Yor\`ub\'a, pitch alone separates \d{o}k\d{o} (husband, Mid), \d{o}k\d{\`o} (vehicle, Low), and \d{o}k\d{\'o} (hoe, High) -- the diacritics ARE the...
By Moses Daudu, Adeola Enitan Bamidele, Honor-Jesus Bezaleel
arXiv:2609.15313v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Autoregressive generation of interleaved text and acoustic tokens is a common approach to spoken-response generation in speech large language models....
By Daxin Tan, Dehua Tao, Chengxi Deng, Hanlin Zhang, Xiao Chen
The paper introduces ABX-Accent, a benchmark built on the AESRC dataset that evaluates how well representation learning models adapt to 10 different English accents with less than 10 hours of unlabeled data per accent. It adapts the Zero Resources Challenge ABX metrics for each accent and demonstrates a baseline using adaptive domain normalization to fine‑tune a Contrastive Predictive Coding model, achieving a 23.6% relative improvement on across‑speaker ABX scores compared to non‑adapted models. The dataset and evaluation metrics will be released publicly after the paper is accepted.
By Robin San Roman, Manel Khentout, Tu Anh Nguyen, Paul Michel, Yossi Adi, Emmanuel Dupoux
The paper investigates whether audio‑language models capture paralinguistic cues beyond spoken content. Using the Expresso dataset and four open‑source models, the authors trace how speaking style information is encoded in the late layers of the audio encoder but is degraded before reaching the final output. They find that some models are content‑driven while others are acoustic‑driven, revealing a gap between what is encoded and what is utilized in current audio‑language models.
By Bhuvan Koduru, Dareen Safar B Alharthi, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj