The paper presents ChatNDE Figure to Caption, an AI system that automates the interpretation of nondestructive evaluation (NDE) images. It combines a Vision‑and‑Language Pretraining (VLP) approach using ResNet50 for visual feature extraction and GPT‑2 for natural‑language captioning, evaluated with BLEU scores. Additionally, a Visual Question Answering (VQA) model is integrated to answer specific queries about the images, enhancing interactivity for field inspectors.
By Mehrdad Shafiei Dizaji, Hoda Azari
The paper introduces VT-Transformer, a model that predicts answerability scores for Visual Question Answering by treating the task as a regression problem rather than a binary classification. It leverages visual and textual features within a Transformer architecture and demonstrates improved performance and robustness on the VizWiz 2020 dataset compared to existing baselines.
By Tung Le, Huy Tien Nguyen, Le Minh Nguyen
arXiv:2608. 12928v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce a Polish-language medical visual question answering (VQA) benchmark, built from Polish Board Certification Examination questions for licensed physicians and dentists pursuing specialist certification.
By Jakub Pokrywka, {\L}ukasz Grzybowski, Antoni Lasik, Marek Kubis, Jeremi Ignacy Kaczmarek, Wojciech Kusa
arXiv:2504.03337v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Existing bias mitigation methods for Visual Question Answering (VQA), a typical Artificial intelligence application, endure two main limitations. F...
By Quanxing Xu, Ling Zhou, Xian Zhong, Feifei Zhang, Rubing Huang
arXiv:2608.28707v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they continue to struggle with quest...
By Anoop Senthil
NoteVQA is a new benchmark that collects 252 real‑life visual questions from the Chinese image‑sharing platform Xiaohongshu, covering 12 topics and 7 user intents. Each question is paired with a concise expert reference and a human‑audited interleaved answer that blends text and visual evidence. The study evaluates VLMs on short‑answer correctness and interleaved answer quality using a new AgenticInterleave framework and a 12‑dimensional IVR‑12 rubric, finding that even state‑of‑the‑art models achieve only about 53% accuracy and lag behind human references in content quality.
By Haonan Jiang, Guojian Zhan, Jiancong Xie, Shijun Wan, Dongiia Zhao, Cheng Chen, Yahui Liu, Yao Hu, Chuan Mu