arXiv AI By Jingwen Zhou, Qinghua Lu, Jieshan Chen, Liming Zhu, Xiwei Xu, Zhenchang Xing, Stefan Harrer

A Taxonomy of Architecture Options for Foundation Model-based Agents: Analysis and Decision Model

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper presents a taxonomy of architecture options for foundation-model-based agents, covering functional capabilities, non‑functional qualities, and operational aspects of design‑time and run‑time phases. It also introduces a decision model to guide critical design and runtime choices, aiming to streamline and improve the development of such agents. By unifying these classifications, the authors seek to reduce fragmentation in the field and provide a structured framework for architects and developers.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 18

Position: It is Time to Virtualize Foundation Models with a Self-evolving Operating System Layer

The paper argues for a Foundation Model Operating System (FMOS) to virtualize foundation model interactions, similar to how operating systems abstract hardware. Current AI stacks are fragmented, with each framework embedding its own runtime for state, memory, budgets, and guardrails, leading to non-portable behavior and brittle governance. An FMOS would orchestrate knowledge across memory tiers, manage model selection and resource allocation, and enforce verification and policy, learning when to intervene or allow direct inference based on operational experience.

By Suparna Bhattacharya, Tarun Kumar, Cong Xu, Satish Kumar Mopur, Jiahao Li, Ashish Mishra, Aalap Tripathy, Annmary Justine Koomthanam, Martin Foltin, Ian Foster
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Bridging Requirements and Architecture: Multi-Agent Orchestration with External Knowledge and Hierarchical Memory

arXiv:2606. 01385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Software architecture design is a critical yet inherently complex and knowledge-intensive phase that requires balancing competing quality attributes and adapting to evolving requirements.

By Ruiyin Li, Yiran Zhang, Xiyu Zhou, Yangxiao Cai, Peng Liang, Weisong Sun, Jifeng Xuan, Zhi Jin, Yang Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Architectural Design, Not Only Model Intelligence, Governs Multi-Agent LLM Performance

The paper argues that the architecture of multi‑agent large language model (LLM) frameworks, rather than just the intelligence of the underlying models, largely determines system performance. It introduces a taxonomy of architectural dimensions—such as orchestration, memory, planning interfaces, specialization, and communication topology—and presents MAFBench, a unified evaluation suite. An empirical study across nine frameworks, keeping the LLM constant, reveals six design principles and shows that choices like orchestration and communication topology can dramatically affect latency, accuracy, and coordination success.

By Abdelghny Orogat, Ana Rostam, Essam Mansour
arXiv AI
Aug 3

OpenClaw and Ollama in Agentic AI: Toward Fully Autonomous and Scalable AI Agent Systems

arXiv:2607. 28629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents.

By Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Ranjan Sapkota