arXiv AI By \'Etienne Clabaut, Samuel Foucher, Yacine Bouroubi

A Systematic Evaluation of the COTQ Provincial Land Cover Product: Structural Consistency, Spectral Separability, and Relative Positioning Against ESA, ESRI, and Google Products

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper evaluates the Quebec-specific 10‑m land‑cover product COTQ against three global 10‑m datasets (ESA WorldCover, ESRI LandCover, and Google DynamicWorld). Using structural indicators, spectral separability metrics, and photo‑interpretation, the study finds that COTQ most closely resembles ESA WorldCover but shows systematic differences in urban, wetland, and rocky classes. The analysis clarifies COTQ’s relative strengths and weaknesses for operational land monitoring in Quebec.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 28

Evaluating AlphaEarth Embeddings for Crop Classification: Separability, Temporal Dynamics, and Cross-Regional Transferability

The paper introduces a framework to evaluate AlphaEarth embeddings for crop classification across spatial, temporal, and cross-regional dimensions. It compares a 64‑dimensional embedding space with traditional Sentinel‑2, NDVI, and harmonic features using field data from the US and India, finding that embeddings offer superior distribution‑aware separability and capture multi‑year crop rotation dynamics, while traditional features transfer better across continents. The study highlights a trade‑off between representational richness and cross‑region transferability, suggesting a hybrid approach for large‑scale crop classification.

By Priyanka Goyal, Maitreyee Sar, Adway Mitra, Manjira Sinha
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

Multi-Modal, Multi-Temporal Geospatial Foundation Models Improve Global Above-Ground Biomass Estimation

The study evaluates 13 Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) for estimating above‑ground biomass (AGB) from satellite imagery, comparing them to a fully supervised state‑of‑the‑art baseline trained on the AGBD dataset. Most GFMs perform worse than the baseline, but TESSERA and AlphaEarth Foundations (AEF) features combined with specific prediction heads achieve superior results, with the best model attaining an RMSE of 50.79 Mg/ha. This AEF‑based model also generalizes better to unseen regions, reduces RMSE by up to 25% in excluded areas, and matches the ESA CCI biomass product when trained on limited regional labels.

By Ghjulia Sialelli, Linus Scheibenreif, Jan Dirk Wegner, Konrad Schindler