arXiv Machine Learning By Luan Mantegazine, Luiza Leidemer, Claudio Geyer

A Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Smart-Contract-Coordinated Federated Learning Marketplaces

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper experimentally evaluates the operational cost of a DAO‑governed blockchain‑enabled federated learning marketplace. It decomposes gas consumption across the entire contract lifecycle, isolates the impact of on‑chain coordination and IPFS storage, and derives an analytical model for cost amortization. Results show a single training task consumes about 3.8 million gas units per trainer, with the average cost per training round reaching its amortization knee after roughly 20 communication rounds, while model performance remains comparable to conventional FL deployments.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Pathwise Individual Rationality in Federated Learning: A Mechanism-Architecture Co-Design

The paper investigates the trade‑off between the costs of participating in federated learning (privacy, communication, compute) and the potential gains in model performance, framing this as a game‑theoretic problem of individual rationality versus autarky. It shows that clients can remain below their local‑training baseline for many rounds and that simply capping per‑round contributions harms learning. The authors propose a new mechanism that provides short‑term participation guarantees and personalized model evaluation, demonstrating theoretically and empirically that clients can avoid short‑term losses without significantly harming overall performance, even under moderate heterogeneity.

By Amin Meghrazi, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Andrew Perrault