arXiv:2602. 08290v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In federated learning (FL), decentralized model training allows multi-ple participants to collaboratively improve a shared machine learning model without exchanging raw data.
arXiv:2410. 11378v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Personalized collaborative learning in federated settings faces a critical trade-off between customization and participant trust.
arXiv:2608. 08574v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Crowdsourced Federated Learning (CrowdFL) extends traditional federated learning by enabling open and heterogeneous participation through a crowdsourcing paradigm.
arXiv:2605. 21115v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for managing electric vehicle (EV) battery data in intelligent transportation systems (ITS), enabling privacy-preserving tasks such as anomaly detection and capacity estimation.
arXiv:2608.21137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) promises trust-free collaborative learning by replacing the centralized parameter server with peer-to-peer model...
arXiv:2512. 13666v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The security and decentralization of Proof-of-Work (PoW) have been well-tested in existing blockchain systems.
arXiv:2609.15521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning enables multiple parties to train a shared model without centralizing raw data with the help of an aggregator, but introduces integr...
arXiv:2606. 04388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as an effective paradigm for collaborative intelligence while preserving data privacy.
arXiv:2606. 18384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) enables scalable collaborative model training across distributed devices while preserving data privacy.
FedReview is a review-based mechanism for federated learning that identifies and removes poisoned model updates without needing a server-side validation dataset or historic client knowledge. In each training round, the server randomly selects reviewers who evaluate incoming updates on their own training data, rank them, and estimate how many low-quality updates are likely poisoned. The server then aggregates these rankings via majority voting to filter out suspicious updates during model aggregation, enabling robust global model training even in adversarial settings.
Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models while retaining data locality, thereby enhancing user privacy. However, traditional FL frameworks rely on a centralized aggregation server and assume honest-but-curious clients, making them susceptible to both server-side inference and client-side poisoning attacks.
arXiv:2607. 08651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralized federated learning (DFL) removes the central server by letting nodes exchange model updates through peer-to-peer gossip, but existing gossip-based methods often lack provenance finality and resilience to Byzantine or lazy participants.
arXiv:2606. 27622v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Byzantine-robust federated learning seeks to protect distributed model training from malicious or corrupted clients without requiring access to their private data.