A Function-Centric Perspective on Flat and Sharp Minima
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The paper investigates whether flatter loss landscapes drive better generalization in the context of Grokking. It shows that sharpness‑aware minimization (SAM) alone does not reliably induce the transition to generalization, but when combined with weight decay, SAM can accelerate this transition up to four times faster. The authors provide a theoretical analysis using a minimal two‑layer ReLU model, demonstrating that flatness alone cannot distinguish memorizing from generalizing solutions, while weight decay favors generalization and a local stability window explains SAM’s effect.
arXiv:2605. 05209v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Flat minima are an account of why deep networks generalise.
arXiv:2607. 06151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalization remains a pivotal challenge in deep learning, where traditional optimizers like Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) often converge to sharp minima, leading to overfitting and reduced performance on unseen data.
arXiv:2602.01718v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Predicting generalization from quantities available before target-test evaluation remains a central challenge in deep learning. The systematic benc...
arXiv:2606. 20469v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A widely held intuition in deep learning is that stochastic gradient descent (SGD) implicitly favors flat minima and that flat minima generalize better, but standard Euclidean measures of flatness such as the trace or maximum eigenvalue of the loss Hessian are not invariant under reparametrizations that preserve the network function, which undermines the theoretical foundations of this narrative.
arXiv:2606. 29043v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sharpness and complexity are two central factors in the generalization analysis of deep neural networks.