arXiv Machine Learning

Never Skip a Batch: Dense Learning of Temporal GNNs via Adaptive Pseudo-Supervision

arXiv:2505. 12526v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Temporal graph networks suffer from irregular supervision in realworld dynamic graphs, as most minibatches contain few labeled events.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

SiST-GNN: Simultaneous Spatial-Temporal Message Passing for Dynamic Graph Representation Learning

SiST‑GNN introduces a simultaneous spatial‑temporal message‑passing framework for dynamic graph neural networks, fusing per‑node temporal embeddings with spatial aggregation in a single operation. By maintaining a recurrent hidden state per node and treating it as a cross‑time edge, the model jointly reasons over topology and evolution. Experiments on link‑prediction and node‑classification benchmarks show significant improvements over prior methods, achieving up to 158% gains in live‑update link prediction and outperforming discrete‑time baselines by 7–23% in dynamic node classification.

By Shubhajit Roy, Anirban Dasgupta
arXiv AI
Sep 10

TTGBench: Benchmarking Topological Evolution and Semantic Drift in Text-attributed Temporal Graphs

TTGBench is a new benchmark for temporal graph learning that evaluates both structural evolution and semantic drift in text‑attributed graphs. It includes six real‑world, text‑rich datasets with dual volatility and supports multi‑class and multi‑label temporal node classification, addressing gaps left by existing benchmarks. A comprehensive evaluation of 17 state‑of‑the‑art methods shows a clear divide: TGNNs excel at structural prediction but struggle with semantic tracking, while LLM‑based models perform better on semantic tasks but lag in structural prediction.

By Longfei Ma, Zemin Liu, Fei Wu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
5d ago

Do Temporal Link Predictors Need Learned Memory? A Smoothed-Count Baseline with a Handful of Parameters

The paper investigates whether temporal link predictors can forgo learned node representations in favor of simple statistical counts of interaction patterns. It introduces a predictor that aggregates transition and co‑occurrence counts, smooths them with destination frequencies or Kneser‑Ney continuation counts, and combines these with popularity, source history, and recency via a shared log‑linear rule. With only 9–13 learned parameters, the model achieves the best mean reciprocal rank on 7 of 16 datasets and outperforms several baselines across all evaluated datasets, demonstrating that a lightweight, count‑based approach can rival more complex neural methods.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17

What Do Temporal Graph Learning Models Learn?

arXiv:2510. 09416v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning on temporal graphs has become a central topic in graph representation learning, with numerous benchmarks indicating the strong performance of state-of-the-art models.

By Abigail J. Hayes, Tobias Schumacher, Markus Strohmaier
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

CacheDyG: Decoupling Temporal Propagation for Efficient Dynamic Graph Learning

CacheDyG introduces a cache‑refine framework that decouples temporal propagation from parameter updates in dynamic graph neural networks. By storing graph‑aware node‑time representations in non‑trainable buffers and updating only a lightweight refiner, residual gate, and link predictor during training, it reduces repeated recomputation of historical structures. Experiments on five benchmarks show that CacheDyG uses fewer trainable parameters, runs faster, and achieves competitive or better predictive performance compared to existing baselines.

By PinHeng Zong, Ye Yuan