arXiv:2609.26855v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Relational Deep Learning (RDL) models multi-table databases as heterogeneous temporal graphs, and graph transformers currently achieve state-of-the-a...
By Kyaw Hpone Myint, Nan Jiang, Xiang Li, Zhe Wu, Alexandre G. R. Day, Pranab Mohanty, Giri Iyengar
The article surveys Dynamic Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning (DHGRL), a field that tackles the challenges of modeling evolving, multi‑type networks. It introduces a unified definition covering both discrete‑time and continuous‑time DHGs, and proposes an algorithm‑centric taxonomy that groups methods into embedding‑based, GNN‑based, and Transformer‑based approaches, highlighting their biases toward temporal granularity. The survey also reviews key applications, datasets, benchmarks, and outlines future research directions.
By Huan Liu, Pengfei Jiao, Jie Yin, Hongjiang Chen, Zhidong Zhao
Relational Deep Learning (RDL) models multi-table databases as heterogeneous temporal graphs, and graph transformers currently achieve state-of-the-art performance on benchmarks like RelBench. However...
arXiv:2603. 24304v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) deliver strong performance on graph tasks, but their accuracy drops significantly under out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios.
By Bowen Lu, Liangqiang Yang, Teng Li, Kun Zhang
The paper introduces the Graph Dynamics Model (GDM), a world model that learns stochastic latent dynamics over evolving graph topologies. GDM employs a sparse recurrent adjacency matrix for topology updates and a recurrent state‑space architecture for stochastic transitions, enabling it to handle partially observable, stochastic environments. The authors also propose the Graph Distribution Distance (GDD) metric, using maximum mean discrepancy with a graph kernel, to compare predicted and true joint graph state distributions, and demonstrate GDM’s superior performance and zero‑shot generalisation on large graphs.
By Alex Schutz, Nick Hawes, Victor-Alexandru Darvariu
arXiv:2510. 09416v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning on temporal graphs has become a central topic in graph representation learning, with numerous benchmarks indicating the strong performance of state-of-the-art models.
By Abigail J. Hayes, Tobias Schumacher, Markus Strohmaier
arXiv:2606. 05994v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical knowledge graphs (MKGs) infused with clinical knowledge have been increasingly used to model electronic health records (EHRs) to support interpretable predictions in healthcare domain.
By Thummaluru Siddartha Reddy, Vempalli Naga Sai Saketh, Yash Punjabi, Mahesh Chandran
The paper explores how information propagates in Deep Graph Networks (DGNs) for both static and dynamic graphs, treating DGNs as dynamical systems. It presents new architectures that better preserve long‑term node dependencies and learn complex spatio‑temporal patterns from irregular, sparsely sampled dynamic graphs. The work combines theoretical analysis with empirical results to demonstrate the effectiveness of these designs.
By Alessio Gravina
Graph Hierarchical Recurrence (GHR) is a new framework that enhances Graph Neural Networks and Graph Transformers by jointly processing the input graph and a pooled hierarchical abstraction. It addresses the limitation of existing models in handling predictions that depend on correlations between distant graph regions, especially under out-of-range generalization where test instances require interactions beyond training distances. Across many long-range benchmarks, GHR consistently improves performance, achieving state‑of‑the‑art or competitive results on multiple tasks.
By Stefano Carotti, Marco Pacini, Alessio Gravina, Davide Bacciu, Bruno Lepri, Sebastiano Bontorin
TTGBench is a new benchmark for temporal graph learning that evaluates both structural evolution and semantic drift in text‑attributed graphs. It includes six real‑world, text‑rich datasets with dual volatility and supports multi‑class and multi‑label temporal node classification, addressing gaps left by existing benchmarks. A comprehensive evaluation of 17 state‑of‑the‑art methods shows a clear divide: TGNNs excel at structural prediction but struggle with semantic tracking, while LLM‑based models perform better on semantic tasks but lag in structural prediction.
By Longfei Ma, Zemin Liu, Fei Wu
arXiv:2602. 08629v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Causal discovery is essential for advancing data-driven fields such as scientific AI and data analysis, yet existing approaches face significant time- and space-efficiency bottlenecks when scaling to large graphs.
By Bo Peng, Sirui Chen, Jiaguo Tian, Yu Qiao, Chaochao Lu
arXiv:2602. 14239v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting links in sparse, continuously evolving networks is a central challenge in network science.
By Nafiseh Sadat Sajadi, Behnam Bahrak, Mahdi Jafari Siavoshani