arXiv:2607. 01893v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by drafting a block of tokens that the target model verifies left-to-right, committing only the longest accepted prefix.
By Tianjian Yang, Meng Li
arXiv:2608. 03447v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by verifying a draft block with a target model in parallel.
By Yuannuo Feng, Zegang Peng, Yuxin Xie, Yubing Ye, Yizhe Chen, Wenshuai Yao, Wenyong Zhou, Wang Kang
arXiv:2606. 11552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, but their autoregressive decoding process incurs substantial inference costs due to inherently sequential token generation.
By Lexington Whalen, Yuki Ito, Ryo Sakamoto
arXiv:2607. 28166v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion language models expose a provisional prediction at every denoising step, and on many tasks the candidate answer inside it stabilizes before the step schedule is exhausted.
By Chia-Ming Lee, Shao-Kai Liu, Ming-Ching Chang, Xin Li, Yu-Lun Liu, Chih-Chung Hsu
arXiv:2608. 03839v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training-free speculative decoding drafts by matching an exact suffix of the context against a pool of earlier context.
By Tao Jin, Phuong Minh Nguyen, Zhenzhu Yan, Teeradaj Racharak, Naoya Inoue
arXiv:2605. 07284v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A late-layer change learned during post-training may work on the base model's earlier state, or it may depend on earlier computation learned with it.
By Yifan Zhou
Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by having a cheap draft propose tokens that a target verifies in parallel. Frontier models increasingly ship a built-in Multi-Token-Prediction (MTP/NEXTN) draft head under the assumption that the draft is negligibly cheap.
arXiv:2607. 21535v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by having a cheap draft propose tokens that a target verifies in parallel.
By Alagappan Valliappan
arXiv:2606. 16999v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Frozen small code models ( =45.
By Mehmet Iscan
arXiv:2607. 13124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured pruning is a hardware-friendly way to compress LLMs, but it is mostly validated on multiple-choice recognition tasks, while the same compressed checkpoints can collapse on the free-form generation that deployment actually requires.
By Qingyu Zhang, Qianhao Yuan, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Xiang Li, Ming Xu, Jiarui Li, Xiuyin Zhao
arXiv:2608. 11235v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion language models (DLMs) update many tokens in parallel, yet practical decoders often use a fixed denoising horizon.
By Yifan Wu, Yufeng Zhang, Kenli Li
arXiv:2606. 31023v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hard-constrained sequential decision systems have no certified way to spend the test-time compute of modern AI: executing the multi-step drafts of a learned policy or a frozen LLM forfeits the feasibility guarantee a trusted solver provides, while invoking the solver at every step forfeits the speed the AI offers.
By Chenyu Zhou, Qiliang Jiang, Shuning Wu, Xu Zhou