arXiv:2609.10224v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models such as CLIP embed images and text in a shared space, where modality-specific distributions often remain separated. Existing acc...
By Zonglin Yang, Huilan Ma, Xudan Zheng, Yuejun Xie
arXiv:2610.34610v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language anomaly detectors describe normal and abnormal appearance with text, and their gains are commonly credited to the semantic content of t...
By Arda Baris Basaran, Mesut Ceylan, Elgar Fleisch, Filipe Barata
arXiv:2610.33798v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: An image is rarely described only once. Retrieval benchmarks and many collections attach several captions to each picture, yet dual encoders still ju...
By Khang Nhat Hoang Vo, Belal Shoer, Abhirama Subramanyam Penamakuri
The paper evaluates the tablet‑2 long‑term memory engine on multilingual text benchmarks and cross‑lingual photo retrieval without lexical matching. Tablet‑2 achieves high accuracy on LongMemEval‑S (95.7%) and moderate accuracy on BEAM‑1M (67.5%), with minimal variance across runs. In multimodal tests, it outperforms BM25 on image‑cell recall and shows significant language‑dependent performance gaps, especially for low‑resource languages.
By Sunwoo Kim
arXiv:2609.39836v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Contrastive vision-language models map visual and textual representations into a shared normalized embedding space, making cosine similarity the natura...
By Simone Ricci, Niccol\`o Biondi, Federico Pernici
arXiv:2609.07937v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Structured visual reasoning, such as image puzzles, demands fine-grained visual perception, an ability current Vision Language Models (VLMs) lack. VL...
By Harsha Patnala, Debopriyo Banerjee, Ayush Sunil Munot, Somak Aditya
ReWEIGH the Evidence is a training‑free decoding technique that calibrates token‑level ordinal visual evidence to reduce hallucinations in large vision‑language models. It aggregates vocabulary ranks across visual positions, compares candidates to a token‑specific reference derived from unlabeled images, and applies a bounded penalty only when evidence falls below this reference. Experiments on four 7B backbones show up to a 21.3% reduction in hallucinated object mentions while largely preserving or improving descriptive and general performance, with minimal added latency.
By Jihae Jeong, Junha Choi, Hwanjo Yu
arXiv:2609.23717v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Global vision--language similarities compress an image and a caption into one vector, preserving semantics but not which word corresponds to which regi...
By Liuyang Song, Yi Zhang, Zhongyi Deng, Daqian Yang, Hongbo Zhang
arXiv:2608.21832v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Computer-use agents ground natural-language instructions in screenshots to locate interface elements, yet existing benchmarks do not isolate whether mo...
By Md Abrar Jahin, Md Rizwan Parvez
The paper reports that scene text recognition models, while achieving 89–97% accuracy on standard benchmarks, perform significantly worse on rare word–trigram combinations, with a 10–18 point drop in accuracy at the rare‑word/rare‑trigram corner across multiple languages and models. Scaling the vision backbone improves overall accuracy but does not alleviate this corner‑specific deficit. The authors identify the autoregressive decoder’s lexical prior as the root cause and show that architectural changes—specifically moving from autoregressive to CTC decoding—yield the largest improvement for these rare compositions.
By Genpei Zhang
arXiv:2609.26093v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models can answer spatial relation questions confidently even when the image supports an incompatible relation. We formulate relation-g...
By Feixiang Liu, Qiang Qiu, Qingyang Li, Hui Xu
arXiv:2609.37230v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Visual distinctions are often finer than those reflected in linguistic conceptualization. Vision-language models exhibit a similar asymmetry: a disti...
By Woosang Jeon, Jiwon Yang, Soo Chung, Taehyeong Kim