Hugging Face Trending Papers

Learning Color Grading, No Photo Sharing: Federated Aesthetic Preference Learning for Personalized Image Enhancement

Personalized image enhancement should reflect individual aesthetic taste, yet learning such preferences commonly depends on private photos and ratings that are unsuitable for centralized collection. The task must infer preference from sparse, heterogeneous feedback and translate it into natural-looking color transformations on resource-constrained user devices.

arXiv AI
2d ago

Personalized Image Generation with Reasoning and Reflection

arXiv:2610.00737v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalized image generation has remained narrowly focused on conditional synthesis from curated visual exemplars, rather than capturing who a user...

By Bo Ni, Ngoc N. Tran, Qinwen Ge, Franck Dernoncourt, Seunghyun Yoon, Samyadeep Basu, Sungchul Kim, Puneet Mathur, Nedim Lipka, Tong Yu, Yu Wang, Ryan A. Rossi, Tyler Derr
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

Adaptive Color Grading

arXiv:2609.21169v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Independent control of tonescale regions (e.g., shadows, highlights) is essential for painters, photographers and cinematographers to bring 2D images...

By Trevor D. Canham, Abhijith Punnappurath, Michael S. Brown
arXiv AI
3d ago

ReGain: Restoring Subject Fidelity in Personalization on Synthetic Images

ReGain is a training‑free correction that improves subject fidelity in text‑to‑image diffusion models personalized with synthetic images. The authors show that fine‑tuning on synthetic images degrades fidelity due to inflated classifier‑free guidance, especially at high frequencies. ReGain measures this inflation per frequency band and scales it down during sampling, closing 51‑64% of the fidelity gap on Stable Diffusion v1.5 and improving performance on SDXL and SD 3.5 while preserving text alignment.

By Shubhang Bhatnagar, Ishan Bhatnagar, Viraj Shah, Narendra Ahuja
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Efficient Personalization of Generative User Interfaces

The paper "Efficient Personalization of Generative User Interfaces" addresses the challenge of tailoring generative user interfaces (GenUIs) to individual users when interface screens are not pre‑defined. By collecting judgments from 20 participants on 600 GenUI pairs, the authors show low agreement (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.25) and diverse rationales for UI preferences. They propose a sample‑efficient personalization method that leverages a few pairwise judgments to weight prior users’ preferences, outperforming a pretrained UI evaluator and a larger multimodal model offline and outperforming all baselines in an online study with 12 new users. "whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates a practical approach to personalizing on‑demand interfaces, showing that even sparse, subjective feedback can be effectively used to improve user satisfaction with generative UI designs."

By Yi-Hao Peng, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Jason Wu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 13

P2Fusion: Prompt-based Progressive Infrared-Visible Image Fusion via Dual-Prior Distillation

Infrared-visible image fusion (IVIF) is pivotal for multimodal perception, yet reconciling the inherent information disparity between thermal and textural features remains a fundamental challenge. Existing prior-guided methods often rely on static constraints that induce optimization conflicts or utilize extrinsic semantic priors from large-scale foundation models (e.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

VGA-BenchV2: An Expanded Unified Benchmark and Multi-Model Framework for Evaluating Video Aesthetics and Generation Quality

VGA‑BenchV2 is an expanded, human‑aligned benchmark and optimization framework that jointly evaluates video generation quality and aesthetic value. It builds on the original VGA‑Bench taxonomy, adding 52 sub‑dimensions and 1,016 curated prompts to generate over 60,000 videos from 12 mainstream models. The benchmark significantly enlarges human supervision with 36,000 task‑level annotations and introduces a hybrid evaluator (VAQA‑Net, VTag‑Net, VGQA‑Net) that aligns well with human judgments and can be used as a reward model for reinforcement‑learning fine‑tuning.

By Longteng Jiang, DanDan Zheng, Qianqian Qiao, Heng Huang, Huaye Wang, Yihang Bo, Bao Peng, Jingdong Chen, Jun Zhou, Xin Jin