arXiv:2610.27439v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Solving reasoning tasks supported on graphs typically requires providing a Language Reasoning Model (LRM) with a serialized description of the graph....
By Javier Porras-Valenzuela, Arush Arora, Alejandro Ribeiro
arXiv:2605.06462v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Progress in graph learning is hindered by benchmark practices that conflate the contributions of node features and graph structure, making it hard...
By Richard von Moos, Mathieu Alain, Bastian Rieck
arXiv:2606. 15633v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for reasoning over Text-Attributed Graphs (TAGs).
By Donald Loveland, Puja Trivedi, Ari Weinstein, Edward W Huang, Danai Koutra
The paper introduces a two-stage diagnostic evaluation to assess the structural reliability of reasoning graphs used in large language models for tasks like multi-hop question answering. Stage 1 examines how graph reliability depends on topology, prompt design, and model family, while Stage 2 evaluates the impact of graph errors on uncertainty estimation. Findings show that graph-based computation is vulnerable to upstream errors, offers limited benefit as prompt context alone, but improves confidence-based answer discrimination and enables node-level diagnostics.
By Xinyu Liu, Dongqi Fu, Jun Wu
arXiv:2604. 12503v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across various tasks but remain prone to hallucinations in knowledge-intensive scenarios.
By Shuai Wang, Xixi Wang, Yinan Yu
arXiv:2606. 15633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for reasoning over Text-Attributed Graphs (TAGs).
By Donald Loveland, Puja Trivedi, Ari Weinstein, Edward W Huang, Danai Koutra
arXiv:2608. 12391v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph reasoning provides a promising testbed for evaluating the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), as graph instances can be programmatically generated, structurally controlled, and naturally scaled to long-input settings.
By Fali Wang, Ali Al-Lawati, Iliyas Bektas, Jinxuan Fang, Alek Melenski, Tianxiang Zhao, Yao Ma, Suhang Wang
arXiv:2511. 07457v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in modeling sequential textual data and generalizing across diverse tasks.
By Jiarui Feng, Donghong Cai, Yixin Chen, Muhan Zhang
arXiv:2605.10247v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Applying Large Language Models (LLMs) to graph-structured data usually involves multi-step pipelines in which textual node attributes are compresse...
By Dario Vajda
arXiv:2606. 07526v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for recommendation (LLMRec) due to their powerful reasoning and generalization abilities.
By Lin Mu, Guoji Wang, Li Ni, Lei Sang, Zhize Wu, Peiquan Jin, Yiwen Zhang
arXiv:2610.15107v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Chain-of-thought prompting enables reasoning in large language models but produces explanations that are difficult to verify, expensive to generate, an...
By Petr Senatorov, Karim Vafin, Elena Tutubalina, Oleg Somov
The paper introduces GUT, a method that uses directed acyclic graphs to represent all possible reasoning branches of Large Language Models (LLMs). It comprises two modules: GUT-Q, which quantifies reasoning uncertainty by approximating graph complexity, and GUT-O, which reduces uncertainty through reinforcement learning that rewards lower uncertainty. Experiments on four LLMs across five datasets demonstrate GUT’s effectiveness in measuring and mitigating reasoning uncertainty.
By Shuang Liang, Xin-Yu Hu, Xiang-Jun Ou, Shao-Qun Zhang