arXiv AI

Commonsense-Grounded Path Planning from Abstract Instructions

arXiv AI
Sep 28

Actively Resolving Contextual Uncertainty for Underspecified Tasks in Natural Language

The paper introduces CLUE, a framework that lets robots actively resolve contextual uncertainty for underspecified natural language tasks. CLUE employs an LLM-derived policy to generate task-relevant hypotheses and plans, then uses an online language-embedded map to ground these into actions, refining its plan through closed-loop interaction. Experiments on a Boston Dynamics Spot across diverse indoor and outdoor settings show CLUE achieving near-oracle performance and outperforming LLM planners without closed-loop feedback by a significant margin.

By Zachary Ravichandran, Jonathan Diller, Fernando Cladera, Varun Murali, George J. Pappas, Vijay Kumar
arXiv AI
Sep 25

GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI

GRASP is a multi-stage planning framework that improves the reliability of large language models on complex tasks. It separates planning into three specialized modules—GenPlan for global macro-guidelines, RevPlan for exploring localized strategies, and VerPlan for multi-criteria evaluation—allowing context isolation and strict macro-regularization. Experiments show GRASP outperforms direct LLM planners by significant margins on datasets such as Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling, ZebraLogic, and SciBench Math, and it mitigates performance collapse in multi-task and dual-task settings.

By Arunabh Srivastava (Amir), Mohammad A. (Amir), Khojastepour, Srimat Chakradhar, Sennur Ulukus
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 14

LLM-BabyBench: Can Language Models Plan in Worlds They Can Simulate?

LLM‑BabyBench transforms the BabyAI gridworld into a fully observable, purely textual setting that isolates planning as the sole source of failure. By serialising the entire grid, providing formal instructions, and validating actions deterministically, the benchmark introduces the PPD suite—Predict, Plan, and Decompose tasks—each scored with metrics that separate mission understanding from sequencing. Across a range of large language models, simulation accuracy is high while planning success drops sharply beyond a model‑specific horizon, revealing that plan length—not grid size—drives failure and that models often commit to a single corridor‑shaped route without backtracking.

By Idriss Malek, Omar Choukrani, Daniil Orel, Anh Duy Le Dinh, Zhuohan Xie, Zangir Iklassov, Martin Tak\'a\v{c}, Salem Lahlou
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

LEEVLA: Seeing What Matters in Latent Environment Evolution for Vision-Language-Action

Vision-language-action (VLA) models aim to map multimodal inputs to robot actions. However, most existing approaches struggle to cover complex dynamic scenarios due to treating all visual tokens uniformly and reasoning with human-selected factors, which lack mechanisms to emphasize task-critical evidence and ignore underlying factors.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 24

GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI

GRASP is a multi-stage planning framework that separates planning into specialized modules: GenPlan for global macro-guidelines, RevPlan for exploring localized strategies, and VerPlan for multi-criteria evaluation. This strategy-aware approach yields state‑of‑the‑art accuracy on diverse datasets, outperforming direct LLM planners by up to 30.8% on ZebraLogic and reducing multi‑task degradation. GRASP’s context isolation and macro‑regularization also give it a 14.5% edge over frontier reasoning models like GPT‑5‑mini.

arXiv AI
4d ago

Seeing Beyond the Next Step: World-Model-Guided Human-Like Navigation in Multi-Agent Scenes

The paper proposes using world models only during training to distill foresight into a fast navigation policy, rather than deploying them online. By combining a visual action prior with two task‑aligned world models—one for social dynamics and one for scene semantics—the authors score candidate actions based on predicted consequences and refine the policy through group‑relative preference distillation. The resulting policy, which runs in a single forward pass at deployment, outperforms reactive and learned baselines in safety, social coherence, and goal‑directedness across five held‑out scenarios, and observers rate its motion as more human‑like.

By Seong-Eun Hong, JuYeong Hwang, Jinhyun Kim, Hanyoung Jang, HyeongYeop Kang