arXiv AI
Grounded World Model: Latent Planning with Language Goals
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Computer Vision
1d ago
The Planning Limits of Latent World Models
arXiv:2609.39235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: World models offer a promising way to help robots understand how the physical world evolves and plan complex behaviours through imagination. Yet exis...
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22
FIRM-WM: State-factorized factual-interventional recurrent modeling for reward-free visual planning
FIRM-WM is a compact pixel world model that separates a goal‑comparable configuration from a 128‑dimensional dynamic fiber, enabling reward‑free visual planning from offline videos. It addresses two key mismatches: aligning planning states with goal images and reconciling factual trajectories with interventional sampling. In experiments, FIRM‑WM achieves high success rates on TwoRoom, Reacher, and OGBench‑Cube while using fewer parameters and faster planning times than prior models.
arXiv AI
Jun 17
PearlVLA: Progressive Embodied Action-Plan Refinement in Latent Space
arXiv:2606. 17924v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models face a trade-off between efficient action generation and explicit deliberation.
arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago
EVO-WAM: Evolving World Action Models through Video-Action Verification
arXiv:2609.38057v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Improving robot policies on new tasks without collecting additional expert demonstrations remains a central challenge in robot learning. World action m...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18
Hierarchical Planning with Latent World Models
arXiv:2604. 03208v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: World models are a promising path to zero-shot embodied control through planning.
arXiv AI
Sep 18
JEPA-WAM: Connecting Generated Visual Instructions to World Action Models through JEPA Latent Representations
JEPA-WAM enhances World Action Models (WAMs) by pairing text instructions with stochastically generated visual cues, using a text-to-image generator and a frozen V‑JEPA encoder to create dense goal representations. These representations are compressed into goal tokens that condition both video and action experts via cross‑attention, enabling the model to better ground instructions. On a new real‑robot benchmark, JEPA‑WAM attains 87.3%, 74.5%, and 80.9% success rates across in‑distribution, out‑of‑distribution scenes, and out‑of‑distribution instructions, outperforming prior methods by significant margins.