arXiv Computer Vision

VESSI - VLM-Enhanced Support for Surveillance and Investigations

VESSI is a Vision‑Language Model (VLM) framework that enhances automated video surveillance by converting salient visual features into textual descriptions for prompt‑driven interrogation. The authors evaluate four state‑of‑the‑art VLMs and introduce the Composite Model Utility Score (CMUS) to assess performance on largely unlabeled datasets. Results show that the best model flags relevant activity in over 66% of videos while cutting review time by more than 85%, and the CMUS ordering aligns with manual false‑positive rates, supporting its operational use.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

BodyCam-VQA: Enhanced Body-Worn Camera Video Captioning via Multimodal Reasoning and Probe Question Generation

The paper introduces BodyCam-VQA, an adaptive visual question answering framework designed to improve captioning of police body‑worn camera footage. By employing structured multimodal reasoning and probe question generation, the system extracts fine‑grained visual evidence that conventional captioning models miss. Experiments with various question generation models show that this VQA‑driven approach yields more reliable, objective, and detailed records of enforcement events.

By Karish Gupta, Matthew Alex, Alex Li, Yang Wu, Yun-Wei Chu, Kashif Munir, Xiaotian Zhou, Zhengping Ji, Xiaozhong Liu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 6

SteelBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models in Real-World Industrial Environments

Existing video benchmarks evaluate action recognition on consumer videos, egocentric recordings, or simulated industrial environments. They do not test vision-language models under the visual and procedural conditions of real industrial CCTV, where workers appear as distant figures amid dust, steam, low light, glare, occlusion, and overlapping activities.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

Can Vision-Language Models Analyze Human-Centered Video? Mapping Model Capabilities and Human-AI Collaborative Workflows

The paper investigates when vision‑language models (VLMs) can independently analyze human‑centered video and when human oversight is still needed. By reviewing 1,702 CHI 2026 papers, the authors develop a five‑dimensional taxonomy of video annotation tasks and build a benchmark of 15 representative tasks. Experiments show that VLMs alone achieve near‑human accuracy (HNS = 97.0), while human verification of VLM outputs yields the highest accuracy (HNS = 121.5) and significantly reduces annotation time and cost.

By Xiyuan Shen, Jiuyang Lyu, Seokhyun Hwang, Huanfen Yao, Shwetak Patel, Zhihan Zhang, Jacob O. Wobbrock
arXiv Computer Vision
5d ago

HeiCo-FOCUS: A Clinically Grounded Dataset for Long-Context Video Understanding

arXiv:2610.10156v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have led to rapid progress in video understanding across a wide range of benchmark tasks. However, exi...

By Leon Mayer, Lucas Luttner, Patrick Godau, Kai Fritzsche, Annika Reinke, Leonie Boland, Jule Brandt, Janne Heinecke, Chloe K. Nobuhara, Niklas Holzwarth, Evangelia Christodoulou, Marcel Knopp, Dominik Michael, Pascale Piermarco, Saliq Neyaz, Korhan Derin \"Ozarslan, Jakob Hennighausen, Carlos Aumente-Maestro, Tim R\"adsch, Dheeraj Baji, Peter Maximilian Full, Finn Aichholz, Justus Veit Erpenbeck, Linus Finn Schott, Bastian Winkelhausen, Claas de Boer, Bianca G\"uttner, Anneli Hummel, Gregor Just, Max Kirchner, Chenyang Li, Rozenn Raffaut, Ariel Rodriguez, Danush Kumar Venkatesh, Kevin Wang, Jinjing Xu, Mona Sheikh Zeinoddin, Salman Khan, Thomas M. Pausch, Stefanie Speidel, Danail Stoyanov, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Fiona R. Kolbinger, Thomas G. Weiser, Lena Maier-Hein
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Parser-Free VLM Verification for Federated Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection

The paper proposes a lightweight federated multiple‑instance learning (MIL) framework that trains only a compact MIL scorer across distributed clients while using a frozen vision‑language model (VLM) to verify high‑scoring video segments post‑hoc. Two VLM feedback interfaces are explored: a parsed text‑generation interface and a logit‑based interface that derives a continuous anomaly score from next‑token Yes/No probabilities. Experiments on UCF‑Crime with InternVL3.5‑2B and Qwen3‑VL‑2B‑Instruct show that the logit interface consistently improves frame‑level AUC and AP over the MIL baseline without requiring temporal post‑processing, whereas the text‑generation interface is more sensitive to prompts, parsers, and model choice.

By S\'ebastien Thuau, Amira Gran, Siba Haidar, Rachid Chelouah