arXiv AI

Towards a Bridge Layer Between Bibliographic and Formalized Mathematical Knowledge

arXiv:2606. 11430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mathematical knowledge is split between bibliographic databases (e.

arXiv AI
Sep 2

The zbMATH Open Knowledge Graph: Tracing Centuries of Mathematical Research

The zbMATH Open Knowledge Graph is a large-scale RDF knowledge graph that spans more than 250 years of mathematical scholarship. It goes beyond traditional bibliographic metadata by incorporating expert-curated semantic content such as reviews, keywords, subject classifications, software references, and disambiguated authorship. With 34 million entities and 168 million RDF triples, the graph enables fine-grained, historically grounded exploration of mathematical concepts, research fields, and scholarly relationships over time.

By Yuni Susanti, Moritz Schubotz
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Automated Conjecture Resolution with Formal Verification

arXiv:2604. 03789v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models have significantly improved their ability to perform mathematical reasoning, extending from elementary problem solving to increasingly capable performance on research-level problems.

By Haocheng Ju, Guoxiong Gao, Jiedong Jiang, Bin Wu, Zeming Sun, Shurui Liu, Leheng Chen, Yutong Wang, Yuefeng Wang, Zichen Wang, Wanyi He, Peihao Wu, Liang Xiao, Ruochuan Liu, Bryan Dai, Bin Dong
arXiv AI
Jun 16

SorryDB: Can AI Provers Complete Real-World Lean Theorems?

arXiv:2603. 02668v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present SorryDB, a dynamically-updating benchmark of open Lean tasks drawn from 78 real world formalization projects on GitHub.

By Austin Letson, Leopoldo Sarra, Auguste Poiroux, Oliver Dressler, Paul Lezeau, Dhyan Aranha, Frederick Pu, Aaron Hill, Miguel Corredera Hidalgo, Julian Berman, George Tsoukalas, Lenny Taelman
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Learning to Discover Interesting Mathematics

The paper introduces a method for evaluating the intrinsic interestingness of mathematical theorems by comparing the length of their proofs to the length of their statements. It trains a 27B language model to predict proof difficulty, enabling the generation and selection of more interesting theorems while significantly reducing overlap with existing Mathlib. The approach allows iterative expansion of a self‑building, machine‑verified mathematical library guided by quantifiable metrics.

By Niket Patel, Ahmad Rammal, Amaury Hayat, Remi Munos, Julia Kempe
arXiv AI
Sep 16

AquiLLM: Evaluating Faithfulness in Open-Weight RAG-LLM Systems for Scientific Research

arXiv:2609.16519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific research increasingly relies on large, heterogeneous data sources, motivating interest in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems that...

By Bernie Boscoe, Srinath Saikrishnan, Vikram Seenivasan, Jack Stark, Andrew Lizarraga, Morgan Himes, Jonathan Soriano, PJ Allen, Tuan Do
arXiv AI
Aug 24

ProofJudge: Tool-Grounded LLM Evaluation of Formal Proof Quality in Mathlib

ProofJudge is an agentic large language model that evaluates the quality of formal proofs in Lean 4 beyond mere correctness. It scores proofs on five dimensions—library leverage, automation fit, structural clarity, statement quality, and Mathlib conventions—using tool access to the relevant repository commit. The system was tested on 218 Mathlib declarations, achieving alignment with human reviewers between 63.5% and 80.8% and releasing its harness, dataset, and traces for open research.

By Shane Caldwell