arXiv:2606. 09138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) has become an important post-training paradigm for turning LLMs from static chatbots into interactive agents, giving rise to representative applications such as OpenClaw.
By Daoyu Wang, Mingyue Cheng, Qingchuan Li, Shuo Yu, Jie Ouyang, Qi Liu
arXiv:2603. 03589v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) transform how machine learning (ML) pipelines are developed and evaluated.
By Arnab Phani, Elias Strauss, Sebastian Schelter
arXiv:2510. 15416v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We investigate a framework in which LoRA adapters are treated as callable tools that a base language model can dynamically select and invoke.
By Pavan C Shekar, Aswanth Krishnan
arXiv:2607. 28629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents.
By Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Ranjan Sapkota
arXiv:2607. 16617v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate data-processing workflows, yet coding agents typically produce scripts that are not automatically materialized as persistent, editable platform artifacts.
By Runming He, Zhen Hao Wong, Hao Liang, Zimo Meng, Chengyu Shen, Xiaochen Ma, Wentao Zhang
arXiv:2609.05576v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The paradigm of LLMs has rapidly shifted from passive language interfaces to autonomous Claw-like agents that execute long-horizon tasks across statefu...
By Yirong Zeng, Shen You, Jinhang Feng, Yufei Liu, Xiao Ding, Yutai Hou, Hao Cong, Yuxian Wang, Wu Ning, Wang Xu, Bibo Cai
arXiv:2608.22167v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become an effective way to improve the tool-use ability of large language models (LLMs), but most existing RL framework...
By Ziyang Luo, Yan Yang, Xiangru Jian, Ziji Shi, Xiaoqiang Lin, Jun Hao Liew, Silvio Savarese, Junnan Li
arXiv:2607. 15660v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While LLM agents demonstrate strong reasoning abilities in compact and well-defined scenarios, they struggle to maintain robustness and effectiveness when faced with large-scale, diverse, and dynamic real-world environments that demand seamless tool integration.
By Shuaiyu Zhou, Fengpeng Yue, Zengjie Hu, Yuanzhe Shen, Chenyang Zhang, feng hong, Cao Liu, Ke Zeng
arXiv:2604. 18543v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Constructing environments for training and evaluating claw-like agents remains a manual, human-intensive process that does not scale.
By Xirui Li, Ming Li, Ion Stoica, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Tianyi Zhou
SPADE (Self-Play in Adaptive Synthetic Executable Environments) is a reinforcement‑learning framework where a single large language model acts as both an Environment Designer—creating executable, long‑horizon training environments—and a Reasoning Agent—learning to act within those environments. The framework uses a regret signal based on the difference between rewarded performance with and without privileged hints to guide the Designer toward environments that are challenging yet solvable. Experiments show that, when scaled to 30‑billion‑parameter models, SPADE outperforms fixed‑environment baselines by significant margins across math, science, code, and reasoning benchmarks, and improves tool‑use performance on BFCL‑v4 and ACEBench‑Agent.
whyItMatters":"By making environment design a learnable component, SPADE enables continuous self‑improvement and demonstrates that adaptive, self‑generated training environments can substantially boost language‑model performance across diverse tasks."
By Bo Liu, Simon Yu, Yiding Jiang, Ao Qu, Andrew Zhao, Zichen Liu, Junsu Kim, Zijian Zhou, Seungone Kim, Tongzheng Ren, Mickel Liu, Hanfei Yu, Zhaorun Chen, Weiyan Shi, Paul Pu Liang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Yejin Choi, Natasha Jaques
UniACE is a unified framework that standardizes the evaluation of large language model (LLM) agents by representing each benchmark as an instruction–tool–environment triplet and running models through a shared, task‑agnostic harness in isolated runtimes. It preserves native success criteria, offers an offline mode for dynamic‑resource tasks, and standardizes efficiency metrics, execution records, and failure attribution. Applying UniACE to 7 benchmarks across 24 domains and 15 models revealed significant score shifts, ranking reversals, and sensitivity to evidence representation, highlighting the impact of evaluation configuration on reported agent performance.
By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao
arXiv:2608.29596v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Autonomous large language model (LLM) agents increasingly face reliability, context consumption, and execution stability bottlenecks when deployed on c...
By Sanket Badhe, Deep Shah, Priyanka Tiwari, Nehal Kathrotia