arXiv:2605. 26179v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Density functional theory (DFT) serves as the basis for computational discovery in materials science and chemistry, yet each calculation demands extensive human effort: adjusting algorithms when convergence stalls, revising plans when unexpected physics emerges, and inserting steps as intermediate results reshape the problem.
By Penghui Yang, Zhonghan Zhang, Yue Li, Xinrun Wang, Yanchen Deng, Yuhao Lu, Bijun Tang, Zheng Liu, Bo An
arXiv:2603. 15952v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are capable of emulating reasoning and using tools, creating opportunities for autonomous agents that execute complex scientific tasks.
By Jacopo Teneggi, S. M. Bargeen A. Turzo, Tanya Marwah, Alberto Bietti, P. Douglas Renfrew, Vikram Khipple Mulligan, Siavash Golkar
arXiv:2608. 03501v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI for Research (AI4Research) leverages AI to automate and improve scientific workflows.
By Zejun Liu, Jian Wu, Ru Peng, Yuliang Ji, Dongyuan Li, Renhe Jiang, Yue Zhang
arXiv:2507. 14267v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents can execute long-horizon scientific workflows, but their numerical outputs are difficult to trust: agents lose context, game verification checks, and can produce large volumes of plausible yet invalid results.
By Ziqi Wang, Hongshuo Huang, Hancheng Zhao, Changwen Xu, Shang Zhu, Jan Janssen, Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan
arXiv:2607. 22596v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Atomistic simulations are central to materials design, but their execution involves complex, multi-step workflows that require significant human expertise.
By Rahul Somasundaram, Adela Habib, Khanh Dang, Sachin Shivakumar, Ryley G. Hill, Golo Wimmer, Avanish Mishra, Aleksandra Pachalieva, Arthur Lui, Hari Viswanathan, Michael Grosskopf, Saryu Fensin, Russell Bent, Nathan DeBardeleben, Earl Lawrence
AI for Research (AI4Research) leverages AI to automate and improve scientific workflows. While experimental design is a critical stage of the research process, prior work has focused primarily on code implementation and execution, overlooking the importance of this stage, and no benchmark exists to evaluate AI's ability to conduct systematic experiment design.
arXiv:2512. 19458v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in agentic frameworks for scientific discovery.
By Zeyu Xia, Jinzhe Ma, Congjie Zheng, Zhongyao Wang, Shufei Zhang, Yuqiang Li, Hang Su, P. Hu, Changshui Zhang, Xingao Gong, Wanli Ouyang, Lei Bai, Dongzhan Zhou, Mao Su
arXiv:2608. 15776v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the powerful multi-scale modeling methods and high-throughput infrastructures established in the materials community, real material computation workflows remain fragmented and heavily manual, requiring researchers to constantly bridge software tools, data analysis, and intermediate decisions.
By Hongfu Huang, Yuzhe Li, Ao Xu, Bo Liu, Changrui Wang, Kan Tang, Ning Yang, Shengxian Liu, Hanyu Liu, Pengpeng Zhang, Linggang Zhu, Fengkai Liu, Yichen Lu, Tong Zhao, Naihua Miao, Jian Zhou, Zhimei Sun
arXiv:2607. 09789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce PHITSBench, an execution-scored benchmark for the Monte Carlo Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS).
By Xianglin Ji, Svetlana V. Boriskina
arXiv:2606. 19152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Identifying the lowest-energy surface-adsorbate configuration is critical for modeling heterogeneous catalysis, yet exhaustive exploration with ab initio calculations is computationally prohibitive.
By Zongmin Zhang, Yuyang Lou, Bowen Zhang, Junwu Chen, Ryo Kuroki, Xuan Vu Nguyen, Edvin Fako, Lixue Cheng, Philippe Schwaller
Identifying the lowest-energy surface-adsorbate configuration is critical for modeling heterogeneous catalysis, yet exhaustive exploration with ab initio calculations is computationally prohibitive. Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) accelerate structural relaxation but leave the search over the vast configurational space a major bottleneck, and open-loop large language model (LLM) agents lack a physics-grounded feedback mechanism to correct erroneous initial guesses.
arXiv:2606. 22678v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agentic coding harnesses - such as Agent-Skills, Superpowers, and Agent-Rigor - are increasingly deployed to augment underlying LLMs for real-world software engineering tasks.
By Meher Bhaskar Madiraju, Meher Sai Preetam Madiraju