El Agente Potente is an agentic system that integrates typed execution graphs and a coding mode to facilitate machine‑learning interatomic potential (MLIP) driven atomistic simulations. Typed execution graphs offer structured, provenance‑aware workflows where large language models handle planning and routing while deterministic Python code performs scientific computation and validation. The coding agent builds customized workflows for tasks needing procedural flexibility, invoking existing Potente functions for supported calculations. The system is demonstrated across materials discovery, energy‑landscape exploration, adsorption, and catalytic reaction workflows, with benchmarks on reproducibility and LLM token cost.
By Tsz Wai Ko, Jiaru Bai, Thomas Swanick, Yeonghun Kang, Changhyeok Choi, Angelina Qihong Jiang, Aiwei Yin, Varinia Bernales, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik
arXiv:2609.39090v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Data-driven machine learning (ML) techniques have become an essential tool in many domains of science. Their application to atomistic simulations of...
By J\"org Behler, Michele Ceriotti, Cecilia Clementi, G\'abor Cs\'anyi, Alin-Marin Elena, Aditi Krishnapriyan, Joseph W. Abbott, Fabio Affinito, Albert P. Bart\'ok, Ilyes Batatia, Filippo Bigi, Florian N. Br\"unig, Yannick Calvino Alonso, Giuseppe Carleo, Aur\'elie Champagne, Stefan Chmiela, Marc L. Descoteaux, Ralf Drautz, Alexandra Farcas, Meng Gao, Rohit Goswami, Michael F. Herbst, Christian Holm, James R. Kermode, Alexander L. M. Knoll, Tobias Kreiman, Hoang-Thien Luu, Yury Lysogorskiy, Mihai-Cosmin Marinica, Rocco Meli, Klaus-Robert M\"uller, Frank No\'e, Mohamadhosein Nosratjoo, Simon Olsson, Christoph Ortner, Aldo S. Pasos-Trejo, Anyang Peng, Eric Qu, Andrea Rizzi, Mariana Rossi, Bassem Sboui, Gregor N. C. Simm, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Jacopo Venturin, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, William C. Witt, Brandon M. Wood, Tigany Zarrouk, Fabian Zills
arXiv:2512. 19458v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in agentic frameworks for scientific discovery.
By Zeyu Xia, Jinzhe Ma, Congjie Zheng, Zhongyao Wang, Shufei Zhang, Yuqiang Li, Hang Su, P. Hu, Changshui Zhang, Xingao Gong, Wanli Ouyang, Lei Bai, Dongzhan Zhou, Mao Su
arXiv:2606. 12916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Molecular dynamics (MD) is the canonical in-silico method for atomistic molecular science, simulating molecular behavior from first-principle physics.
By Zehong Wang, Yijun Ma, Connor R. Schmidt, Tianyi Ma, Weixiang Sun, Ziming Li, Xiaoguang Guo, Chuxu Zhang, Matthew J. Webber, Yanfang Ye
arXiv:2512. 11935v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic AI systems increasingly connect large language models (LLMs) to external scientific tools, yet whether and when tool access improves prediction accuracy remains uncharacterized.
By Jaehyung Lee, Justin Ely, Kent Zhang, Akshaya Ajith, Charles Rhys Campbell, Kamal Choudhary
The article introduces the concept of agentic programs—scientific software that blends deterministic algorithms with bounded large‑language‑model (LLM) judgment, task‑specific verification, episodic maturation, and full delegation in production. It argues that recent LLM‑based agents enable this new form of computational materials science software. The authors illustrate the idea with DeMARS, an agentic program designed to build atomistic models from experimentally measured disordered crystal structures.
By Yunsung Lim, Haekwan Jeon, Jaesun Kim, Jisu Kim, Seungwu Han
The Perspective reviews the rapid growth of agentic AI systems in computational chemistry, noting an increase from a handful in 2024 to about fifty by August 2026. These systems are evolving from assisting with specific tasks to autonomously designing, executing, and analyzing in‑silico experiments, even drafting manuscripts. While fully autonomous AI scientists are not yet realized and human oversight remains, the trend toward commoditized generalist agents suggests a future where specialized systems may become obsolete, prompting reflection on the field’s direction and priorities.
By Pavlo O. Dral, Hassan Nawaz, Arif Ullah
arXiv:2608. 15776v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the powerful multi-scale modeling methods and high-throughput infrastructures established in the materials community, real material computation workflows remain fragmented and heavily manual, requiring researchers to constantly bridge software tools, data analysis, and intermediate decisions.
By Hongfu Huang, Yuzhe Li, Ao Xu, Bo Liu, Changrui Wang, Kan Tang, Ning Yang, Shengxian Liu, Hanyu Liu, Pengpeng Zhang, Linggang Zhu, Fengkai Liu, Yichen Lu, Tong Zhao, Naihua Miao, Jian Zhou, Zhimei Sun
arXiv:2605. 26179v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Density functional theory (DFT) serves as the basis for computational discovery in materials science and chemistry, yet each calculation demands extensive human effort: adjusting algorithms when convergence stalls, revising plans when unexpected physics emerges, and inserting steps as intermediate results reshape the problem.
By Penghui Yang, Zhonghan Zhang, Yue Li, Xinrun Wang, Yanchen Deng, Yuhao Lu, Bijun Tang, Zheng Liu, Bo An
arXiv:2603. 13191v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have transformed AI agents into proficient executors of computational materials science, performing a hundred simulations does not make a researcher.
By Haonan Huang
The paper extends Co‑Scientist, a Gemini‑based multi‑agent system, and validates it in real‑world scientific settings. In materials science it designed a safe precursor route for MXenes and achieved single‑attempt growth of monolayer MoS₂, MoSe₂, and WS₂. In biology it predicted swarming phenotypes of engineered E. coli, and in computer science it discovered a superior inference‑time scaling architecture for HealthBench. A double‑blind study with 30 experts showed that Co‑Scientist’s reliability modules reduce hallucination and plagiarism while improving research safety.
By Samuel Schmidgall, Xiaokai Zhu, Marian Shaw, Lin Yang, Valentin Li\'{e}vin, Jingyun Yang, Yuchen Zhuang, Tim Strother, Alex Bijamov, Min Woo Sun, Anil Palepu, Justin Chen, David Steiner, Jacqueline Shreibati, Wei-Hung Weng, Yilin Zhao, Xingjian Hu, Nicholas Zahn, Sadhya Garg, Julia Kirby, Yuxiang Gan, Jiaoli Li, Divy Thakkar, Shekoofeh Azizi, David Racz, Juraj Gottweis, Vivek Natarajan, Chenglin Wu, Tal Danino, Keran Rong, Haozhe Wang, Benoit Schillings, Yong Cheng, Quoc V. Le, Tao Tu
The article reviews methods for assessing large language model (LLM) based AI agents in materials synthesis, focusing on their integration with experimental tools. It outlines evaluation strategies—including knowledge, reasoning, tool‑use, and closed‑loop benchmarks—and applies them to atomic layer deposition (ALD) as a case study. A practical framework for evaluating LLMs in this context is also presented.
By Angel Yanguas-Gil