arXiv:2609.33149v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: A common principle of effective learning is to practice material that is neither already mastered nor too difficult to permit progress. We ask how...
By Hongbo Chen, Guohua Lu, Ting Dang, Hong Jia
arXiv:2604. 23270v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has emerged as a simple and effective way to elicit step-by-step solutions from large language models (LLMs).
By Shuxu Chen, Yitian Zhou, Jiaquan Zhang, Haoyu Bian, Wenrui Hu, Aming Wu, Sungyoung Lee, Chaoning Zhang, Hyundong Shin
arXiv:2606. 30704v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel across a wide range of tasks, yet their instance-specific solutions often lack the structural consistency needed for reliable deployment.
By Gan Luo, Zihan Qin, Bin Dong, Wotao Yin
arXiv:2607. 01181v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: RL with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training LMs on tasks with well-defined success metrics, such as code generation and mathematical reasoning.
By Mehul Damani, Isha Puri, Idan Shenfeld, Jacob Andreas
Self-distillation improves reasoning in large language models by using the model's own rollouts as training signal, typically through implicit logit-level alignment that minimizes KL divergence toward a privileged target distribution. However, because this supervision is generated via uncontrolled sampling, it provides no diagnostic insight into the model's specific errors or corrective guidance for its individual failure patterns.
arXiv:2610.04098v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet adapting them to structured domains remains challenging and can yield inconsistent outco...
By Kyuyoung Kim, Peiyao Sheng, Ashwin Hebbar, Peiyang Xu, Yunfei Xie, Kevin Wang, Rui Xin, Chen Wei, Zhangyang Wang, Jinwoo Shin, Pramod Viswanath, Sewoong Oh
arXiv:2601. 15141v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic Reinforcement Learning (RL) has empowered Large Language Models (LLMs) to utilize tools like Python interpreters for complex problem-solving.
By Tianshi Xu, Yuteng Chen, Meng Li
arXiv:2511. 13749v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, which are small, carefully crafted inputs that lead to incorrect predictions.
By Ci Lin, Tet Yeap, Iluju Kiringa
The paper introduces Sparse Adversarial Fine‑Tuning (SAFT), a method that identifies a small set of Robustness‑Critical Parameters (RCPs) through adversarial gradient saliency and updates only these parameters during adversarial training. By focusing on this sparse subspace, SAFT achieves higher clean and robust accuracy than LoRA‑based parameter‑efficient methods and matches or surpasses full‑parameter adversarial training while training only about 5% of the parameters. The approach is validated across multiple architectures and datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing memory cost without sacrificing robustness.
By Zhaoxin Wang, Zihang Ding, Handing Wang
arXiv:2606. 03521v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To improve the real-world applicability of reinforcement learning (RL), the field of adversarially robust RL studies how to train agents under adversarial environment perturbations.
By Siemen Herremans, Ali Anwar, Siegfried Mercelis
Training terminal agents requires executable and verifiable tasks that are not merely solvable, but appropriately challenging for learning. Executable validation establishes feasibility, yet does not reveal how a task behaves relative to a given solver setting.
Flow Reasoning Models (FRMs) are a new framework that turns continuous flow models into efficient recurrent reasoners for structured tasks. By self‑conditioning a flow model on its own past outputs, FRMs iteratively refine solutions, allowing parallel decision making and revision. The authors introduce Fixed‑Point Forcing (FPF) to mitigate exposure bias at deeper recursion, and report near‑perfect solve rates on Sudoku‑Extreme, Zebra, and Maze‑Unique, outperforming existing masked‑diffusion and specialized baselines while using far fewer inference FLOPs.
By Alec Helbling, Andrey Bryutkin, Mauro Martino, Duen Horng Chau, Nima Dehmamy, Hendrik Strobelt