arXiv Machine Learning

On Regularization via Early Stopping for Least Squares Regression

arXiv:2406. 04425v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A fundamental problem in machine learning is understanding the effect of early stopping on the parameters obtained and the generalization capabilities of the model.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 26

A Data-dependent Early Stopping Rule using Rademacher Complexity with L1-norm

The paper proposes an analytic method for determining the optimal early‑stopping time in training neural networks, avoiding the need for gradient‑descent training. It uses Rademacher complexity with an L1‑norm to estimate generalization error, offering a more general approach than previous random‑matrix‑theory based methods. The framework is demonstrated on linear regression and extended to nonlinear neural networks via linear probing, as shown in a MNIST classification example.

By Duy Hoang, Bastien Berret, Olivier Bruneau, Laurent Fribourg
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 10

Risk Comparisons in Linear Regression: Implicit Regularization Dominates Explicit Regularization

arXiv:2509. 17251v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing theory suggests that for linear regression problems categorized by capacity and source conditions, gradient descent (GD) is always minimax optimal, while both ridge regression and online stochastic gradient descent (SGD) are polynomially suboptimal for certain categories of such problems.

By Jingfeng Wu, Peter L. Bartlett, Sham M. Kakade, Jason D. Lee, Bin Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Optimal Regularization for Performative Learning

arXiv:2510. 12249v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In performative learning, the data distribution reacts to the deployed model - for example, because strategic users adapt their features to game it - which creates a more complex dynamic than in classical supervised learning.

By Edwige Cyffers, Alireza Mirrokni, Marco Mondelli
arXiv Statistics ML
Aug 25

Stochastic gradient descent with initial regularization

The paper studies a variant of stochastic gradient descent called SGDIR, which incorporates initial regularization. It derives dimension‑free upper bounds on the expected excess risk for the squared loss, providing new rates for both averaged and non‑averaged SGDIR under various assumptions. The authors also establish matching lower bounds in certain regimes and compare SGDIR to ridge regression in noisy settings, showing comparable performance up to a polylogarithmic factor.

By Nabil Kahal\'e
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 13

A Variational Analysis of Kernel Learning with Learnable Linear Transformations

arXiv:2502. 11665v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The classical kernel ridge regression problem aims to find the best fit for the output $Y$ as a function of the input data $X\in \mathbb{R}^d$, with a fixed choice of regularization term imposed by a given choice of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, such as a Sobolev space.

By Yang Li, Feng Ruan
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Fixed-Gaussian Spectral Algorithms: Minimax Optimal Rates for Misspecified Learning and Transfer

arXiv:2501. 10870v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The principal objective of this work is twofold within nonparametric regression settings: (1) to establish the minimax optimal convergence rates for fixed-bandwidth Gaussian kernel spectral algorithms when the true regression function resides in a Sobolev space, and (2) to apply Gaussian spectral algorithms for achieving robust and adaptive transfer learning under concept shift.

By Haotian Lin, Matthew Reimherr