arXiv AI

Do SpeechLMs Hear Their Own Opinions? Diagnosing and Mitigating Previous-Belief Contamination in Streaming Emotion Understanding

The paper investigates how streaming emotion recognition models can be misled by their own prior predictions, a problem termed previous-belief contamination (PBC). Using a counterfactual diagnostic on CREMA-D-Stream, the authors show that feeding a model’s previous emotion label into its current prediction can drastically lower accuracy and flip many predictions, with the effect varying by label. To mitigate PBC, they propose EmoUpdate, a training‑free framework that isolates current audio perception from historical context through a prior‑blind firewall, a causal belief filter, and a decontamination operator, achieving significant gains across multiple SpeechLMs and benchmarks.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Omni-Streaming Thinking

arXiv:2609.15128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Streaming omni-modal models must decide what and when to answer from the video chunks and synchronized audio observed so far. Visual cues often support...

By Enjun Du, Siyi Liu, Ziyu Zheng, Jingyu Li, Yiwen Guo, Yongqi Zhang, Difan Zou
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Multi-Party Backchannel Prediction: a Diagnosis, a Benchmark, and a Ceiling

The paper introduces a multi‑party backchannel prediction benchmark built from the AMI meeting corpus, featuring 682 masked‑listener views, 190 speakers, and 18,697 backchannel events. A state‑of‑the‑art dyadic model performs at chance when applied zero‑shot to meetings, but its frozen acoustic features are still informative, and retraining improves performance to an AUROC of 0.751. The study reveals that listener conditioning helps only for listeners seen during training, that speaker identity is entangled with useful cues, and that backchannel rates vary significantly across individuals, prompting the authors to report both AUROC and event‑F1 metrics. whyItMatters":"The benchmark and evaluation tools provide a standardized, person‑disjoint testbed for advancing multi‑party backchannel prediction research."

By Mohammed Hafsati, Ahmed Loughzali
arXiv AI
Jun 10

What Do Deepfake Speech Detectors Actually Hear?

arXiv:2606. 10912v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deepfake speech detectors often output a single score without explaining why an audio sample is flagged, where in the signal the evidence lies, or what cues drive the decision.

By Vojt\v{e}ch Stan\v{e}k, Veronika Jirmusov\'a, Anton Firc, Kamil Malinka, Jakub Re\v{s}, Martin Pere\v{s}\'ini
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Parameter isolation with domain-specific experts for incremental audio classification

The paper introduces a domain‑specific parameter‑isolation architecture for domain‑incremental learning (DIL) in audio classification, aiming to preserve knowledge from earlier domains without accessing their data. By employing data‑free generative replay and cross‑domain feature generation, the method constructs new experts conditioned on all previously frozen models, thereby mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Applied to the DCASE 2026 Challenge Task 7, the approach achieves micro and macro accuracies of 78.4 % and 78.9 %, outperforming the baseline by 33 and 25 percentage points, respectively, with ablation studies confirming the contribution of each component.

By Jongyeon Park, Do-Hyeon Lim, Sang-won Park, Hong Kook Kim, Kyungdeuk Ko, Hyeongcheol Geum, Jeong Eun Lim
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Audio LLMs Know When They Can't Hear You

The paper investigates whether audio large language models (Audio LLMs) can detect when their own transcriptions are unreliable. It finds that the models are poor at self-assessment and that existing methods offer limited detection. By leveraging audio-encoder representations, the authors develop a lightweight predictor that accurately flags unreliable transcriptions and can prompt user clarification without altering the underlying model.

By Amirhosein Javadi, Richa Dixit, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Minsik Cho, Devang Naik, Mohammad Samragh