arXiv AI

Reducing the Complexity of Deep Learning Models for EEG Analysis on Wearable Devices

arXiv:2606. 12742v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Wearable healthcare devices are the fastest-growing Internet of Things (IoT) sector.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 28

On-Device Inference versus Wireless Streaming: Energy-Efficient Multi-Modal Deep Learning for Wearable Cardiovascular Patches

arXiv:2510. 18668v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Wearable cardiovascular sensor patches promise continuous, unobtrusive monitoring, but their tight energy, memory, and compute budgets make it unclear whether physiological signals should be analyzed on the device or streamed to the cloud for processing.

By Mustafa Fuad Rifet Ibrahim, Tunc Alkanat, Felix Manthey, Maurice Meijer, Alexander Schlaefer, Peer Stelldinger
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Deep Learning-Based Classification of Cognitive and Resting States Using Electroencephalography Signals

The paper introduces a deep learning framework that uses a CNN‑GRU architecture to classify EEG recordings into resting or cognitive states. Time‑frequency analysis extracts salient signal features, which are then evaluated with both deep learning and traditional machine learning classifiers. The proposed method achieves accuracies of 83.177% for resting vs. mathematical tasks, 76.107% for resting vs. memory tasks, and 83.432% for resting vs. music tasks, outperforming comparative approaches.

By K. A. Januka S. Fernando, Harshit Srivastava
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 17

Deep Learning-Based Classification of Cognitive and Resting States Using Electroencephalography Signals

The paper introduces a deep learning framework that uses a CNN‑GRU architecture to classify EEG recordings into resting and various cognitive states. Time‑frequency analysis is applied to extract salient signal features, which are then evaluated with both deep learning and traditional machine learning classifiers, including a proposed 2D‑Net. The method achieves accuracies of 83.177% for resting vs. mathematical tasks, 76.107% for resting vs. memory tasks, and 83.432% for resting vs. music tasks, outperforming comparative approaches.