arXiv:2606. 01086v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow and diffusion models generate high-quality samples in many modalities; however, many network evaluations are required during inference due to numerical integration of an underlying differential equation.
By Sam McCallum, Zander W. Blasingame, Timothy Herschell, Niklas Rindtorff, Alexander Tong, James Foster
arXiv:2607. 00535v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Few-step flow-map generators, such as consistency models and MeanFlow, accelerate sampling by directly learning long-range transport maps between noise and data.
By Zhiqi Li, Wen Zhang, Bo Zhu
arXiv:2608. 05600v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow-based generative models are typically sampled by solving a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE), whereas online reinforcement learning requires stochastic rollouts for policy exploration and optimization.
By Yingqing Guo, Hui Yuan, Zijian He, Mengdi Wang, Zheng Ding
Flow-based generative models are typically sampled by solving a deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE), whereas online reinforcement learning requires stochastic rollouts for policy exploration and optimization. Existing GRPO methods for flow models therefore replace the inference-time ODE with a stochastic differential equation (SDE) during training.
arXiv:2607. 26398v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion and flow-based models benefit from simple regression losses, but inference incurs significant overhead because sampling requires integration.
By Mark Goldstein, Anshuk Uppal, Raghav Singhal, Aahlad Puli, Rajesh Ranganath
arXiv:2608. 10384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper studies inverse sampling for L\'evy-driven generative models from the perspective of Markov generators.
By Tianfu Qi, Jun Wang, Jun Zhang
arXiv:2601. 14430v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Controlling generative models is computationally expensive.
By Peter Potaptchik, Adhi Saravanan, Abbas Mammadov, Alvaro Prat, Michael S. Albergo, Yee Whye Teh
arXiv:2606. 07835v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A fundamental tension exists in the large-step inference of diffusion models via their deterministic probability flow ordinary differential equation (PF-ODE) trajectories, which we identify as the contractivity trap: efficient inference favors large step sizes, while aggressive steps and highly expressive denoisers can undermine contraction-based stability certificates for error suppression.
By Shigui Li, Delu Zeng
arXiv:2606. 16073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sampling from complex, unnormalized probability densities is a fundamental challenge in Bayesian inference and probabilistic modeling.
By Kirill Korolev, Nikita Morozov, Stepan Pavlenko, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Sergey Samsonov
arXiv:2607. 12922v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Stochastic-process models are, as a rule, far easier to simulate than to condition.
By Louis Sharrock, Lachlan Astfalck, Henry Moss
Stochastic-process models are, as a rule, far easier to simulate than to condition. Non-linear observations, non-Gaussian likelihoods, black-box information, and global constraints all induce intractable conditional laws, requiring bespoke, model-specific constructions.
arXiv:2607. 04780v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods are a natural tool for post-hoc conditioning of pretrained generative models, but in many applications the mutation kernels used by the particle system are biased approximations of an ideal Feynman--Kac flow.
By Stanislas Strasman (SU, LPSM), Gabriel Victorino Cardoso (LPSM), Sylvain Le Corff (LPSM), Vincent Lemaire (LPSM), Antonio Ocello