arXiv Machine Learning

A General $\widetilde{\Omega}(\sqrt{T \gamma_T})$ Lower Bound for Kernel Bandits

The paper establishes a general minimax regret lower bound of Ω(√{Tγ_T/ log T}) for kernel bandits with non‑constant continuous kernels on compact domains, matching existing upper bounds up to logarithmic factors. It shows that this log factor is unavoidable in general but can be removed under specific conditions. Consequently, the optimal scaling is exactly Θ(√{Tγ_T}) for several common kernels, including Matérn‑ν (ν∈(0,2)), γ‑exponential (γ∈(0,2)), and certain piecewise‑polynomial kernels.

arXiv Machine Learning
3d ago

Follow the Perturbed Leader for Linear Bandits: $\sqrt{T}$ Regret over General Convex Sets

The paper presents the first adversarial linear bandit algorithm based on Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader (FTPL) that achieves √T regret over general convex action sets. It achieves a regret of ≥O(d^{5/4}√T) using only linear optimization oracles, and a near‑optimal ≥O(d√T) regret when an optimal‑design exploration distribution is available. The work improves on previous FTPL algorithms and generalizes earlier results for special action sets, offering a simpler and more computationally efficient approach that relies on adaptive perturbation distributions and a new analysis framework based on Fisher information.

By Chen-Yu Wei
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Asymptotic Optimality of Thompson Sampling for Risk-Averse Bandits with Sub-Gaussian Rewards

arXiv:2606. 09191v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We prove that $\rho\text{-}\mathrm{NPTS}_{\mathrm{SG}}$, an anchor-free nonparametric Thompson Sampling algorithm for risk-averse bandits, achieves regret matching the instance-dependent lower bound to leading order in $\log n$, establishing it as asymptotically optimal for any continuous risk functional $\rho$ (CVaR, mean-variance, Sharpe ratio, distortion risk measures, and more) on the class of distributions with bounded density and sub-Gaussian tails, including Gaussian arms.

By Joel Q. L. Chang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 8

Asymptotic Optimality of Thompson Sampling for Risk-Averse Bandits with Sub-Gaussian Rewards

We prove that $ρ\text{-}\mathrm{NPTS}_{\mathrm{SG}}$, an anchor-free nonparametric Thompson Sampling algorithm for risk-averse bandits, achieves regret matching the instance-dependent lower bound to leading order in $\log n$, establishing it as asymptotically optimal for any continuous risk functional $ρ$ (CVaR, mean-variance, Sharpe ratio, distortion risk measures, and more) on the class of distributions with bounded density and sub-Gaussian tails, including Gaussian arms. Both this result and its bounded-support counterpart require only continuity of $ρ$: strictly weaker than the dominance condition of prior parametric Thompson Sampling results, and strictly weaker than the Lipschitz condition of UCB-type algorithms, yielding the first instance-optimal guarantees for non-Lipschitz functionals such as the Sharpe ratio without parametric reward assumptions.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Bandit PCA with Minimax Optimal Regret

arXiv:2607. 10936v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the bandit-feedback version of online principal component analysis (Bandit PCA): in each round $t = 1,\dots,T$, the adversary selects a $d \times d$ symmetric gain matrix $G_t$ with spectrum in $[0,1]$ and rank at most $r$; the learner simultaneously selects a unit vector $w_t \in S^{d-1}$ and receives the reward $w_t^\top G_t w_t$.

By Mo\"ise Blanchard, Dmitrii Ostrovskii, Aadirupa Saha
arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

High-Probability Regret Bounds for Feel-Good Thompson Sampling

The paper presents the first high‑probability regret bounds for both cumulative and current‑step variants of Feel‑Good Thompson Sampling (FGTS) in contextual bandits with general realizable function approximation. The bounds rely on decoupling coefficients and prior mass near the true reward function, and in the linear setting they achieve ≠d√T log(2T)+√T log(1/δ) regret with probability at least 1‑δ. This matches the dimension and horizon dependence of upper‑confidence‑bound algorithms up to logarithmic factors, while the high‑probability cost adds only linear dependence on log(1/δ).

By Xuheng Li, Qingyue Zhao, Quanquan Gu