FusionEval is a new benchmark for evaluating model fusion techniques that combine multiple expert models into a single large language model. It provides controlled expert pools trained from Qwen3 and Llama on domains such as math, code, science, instruction following, and tool use, and evaluates capability retention, computational cost, runtime, and GPU memory across eight public benchmarks. Experiments show that training‑free fusion methods keep reasoning performance but hurt tool use, while MOPD maintains tool use and balances capabilities at the cost of extra data preparation and training.
arXiv:2607. 27248v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While large language models excel in reasoning, these generalists often lack knowledge for specialized scientific domains.
arXiv:2507. 10540v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has created a diverse landscape of models, each excelling at different tasks.
The paper investigates three fusion paradigms—Merge, Mix RL, and multi‑teacher on‑policy distillation (MOPD)—for consolidating reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) across multiple domains. Experiments across model scales and a multi‑domain benchmark show that while overall performance differences are small, significant gaps can appear on specific tasks, and each method exhibits distinct training dynamics and constraints. Practical guidelines are offered: Merge for cheap fusion when experts exist, Mix RL for unified training with adjustable domain mixtures, and MOPD when preserving domain‑specific gains is paramount.
arXiv:2503. 05641v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Combining existing pre-trained LLMs is a promising approach for diverse reasoning tasks.
arXiv:2606. 26671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training alignment determines the reasoning and human preference following capabilities of large language models, yet most existing works withhold detailed data construction, filtering rules and training recipes, which hinders community reproducibility and lightweight model optimization.
arXiv:2607. 18026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can large language models with substantially different parameter spaces be merged by direct weighted averaging, without training or semantic alignment?
The paper introduces OptTips, a knowledge base of 50 expert optimization modeling techniques, and OptDachshund, a multi‑agent framework that generates mathematical models and solver code from natural‑language problem descriptions. Using these tools, the authors create the EfficientOpt benchmark, comprising 561 expert‑reviewed tasks with paired reference implementations, to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on both correctness and computational efficiency. Their experiments with 11 LLMs show a consistent efficiency gap: even when LLMs produce correct solutions, the resulting programs often take longer to solve than expert‑crafted counterparts, highlighting the need to assess both accuracy and runtime performance in LLM‑based optimization modeling.
BoundaryEvo introduces a two‑stage data‑model co‑evolution framework for distilling long‑chain reasoning from large teacher models into small language models. First, Capability Priming distills a small set of teacher trajectories to give the student an initial reasoning baseline. Then, Capability‑Boundary Co‑Evolution iteratively selects questions the student has not mastered but the teacher can solve, updating the training data as the student’s capability grows. With only 1,000 examples, BoundaryEvo improves Qwen3.5‑4B accuracy from 62.9 % to 75.3 % on IMO‑AnswerBench and from 26.8 % to 46.0 % on AMO‑Bench, outperforming static and dynamic baselines across 11 benchmarks.
InternBootcamp is an open‑source framework that offers over 1,000 domain‑diverse task environments for large language model (LLM) reasoning research. It introduces Bootcamp‑Eval, an automatically generated benchmark for comprehensive performance assessment. Experiments show that training on InternBootcamp significantly improves reasoning performance, with a 32B model achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on Bootcamp‑Eval and other established benchmarks, demonstrating that scaling the number of training tasks yields consistent gains.
arXiv:2508. 09883v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities in tasks such as algorithmic coding and mathematical problem-solving.
arXiv:2601. 05106v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strengths across diverse domains.
The paper introduces collaborative learning for large language models, where a single large model is replaced by smaller, heterogeneous models—called model slices—under a comparable parameter budget. By enabling prior reasoning to be reassessed across different model parameterizations and employing pyramid supervision that blends protocol distillation with step‑level supervision, the authors refine reasoning and interaction decisions during collaboration. Experiments on multi‑hop question answering, mathematical reasoning, code generation, and open‑ended constrained generation show that the trained heterogeneous models match or surpass the performance of the original large model and established multi‑agent baselines, while also achieving higher inference efficiency and exhibiting task‑specific collaboration patterns.