The paper introduces collaborative learning for large language models, where a single large model is replaced by smaller, heterogeneous models—called model slices—under a comparable parameter budget. By enabling prior reasoning to be reassessed across different model parameterizations and employing pyramid supervision that blends protocol distillation with step‑level supervision, the authors refine reasoning and interaction decisions during collaboration. Experiments on multi‑hop question answering, mathematical reasoning, code generation, and open‑ended constrained generation show that the trained heterogeneous models match or surpass the performance of the original large model and established multi‑agent baselines, while also achieving higher inference efficiency and exhibiting task‑specific collaboration patterns.
arXiv:2608.29263v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucination and struggle with complex reasoning tasks requiring multi-hop domain knowledge. While inte...
arXiv:2506.11578v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance, ranging from simple to complex tasks. However, while large models achi...
UnifiedPlayers is a cooperative framework that jointly adapts planning, execution, and evaluation for tool-integrated reinforcement learning agents. It consists of a Planning Player that generates tasks, an Execution Player that creates multi-turn trajectories with Python tool calls, and an Evaluation Player that builds executable verifiers, all coordinated by role‑specific rewards under GRPO. The approach outperforms prior baselines on mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks and yields a verifier with high adversarial detection accuracy and more discriminative reward signals.
arXiv:2606. 16774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Equipping Large Language Model (LLM) agents with effective skills is crucial for solving complex tasks in real-world systems like OpenClaw.
The paper proposes a new framework for collaboration between a small language model (SLM) and a large language model (LLM) that treats the interaction as an information acquisition problem under an API budget constraint. Instead of delegating reasoning tasks, the SLM remains the primary reasoner and selectively queries the LLM advisor with targeted questions, using a three-stage RLVR approach to decide when to call the advisor, how to phrase queries, and how to integrate the responses. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and coding tasks show that this strategy improves the performance–cost tradeoff compared to existing baselines and can transfer to other advisor model families without additional training.
MoCo is a Python library that consolidates 26 model collaboration methods for language models, enabling execution, benchmarking, and comparison at scale. It includes 25 evaluation datasets across reasoning, QA, code, safety, and more, allowing users to add their own data. Experiments show that most collaboration strategies outperform non‑collaborative models in 61.0% of settings, with top methods achieving up to 25.8% improvement.
arXiv:2510. 01427v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: At the core of Deep Research is knowledge mining, the task of extracting structured information from massive unstructured text in response to user instructions.
arXiv:2607. 23771v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) performance increasingly depends not only on the base model, but also on the inference-time controller used to organize reasoning.
The paper introduces a method to improve test-time scaling (TTS) for large language models by using multi-agent systems (MAS) to split long reasoning chains into manageable contexts. A new dataset, M500, containing 500 multi-agent collaborative reasoning traces, is used to fine‑tune open‑source models, enabling them to learn collaborative patterns and outperform their base versions. An adaptive scaling strategy with a "CEO" agent is proposed to dynamically guide reasoning depth, and experiments in the AgentVerse framework confirm the effectiveness of the approach.
AgenticRag‑R1 is a reinforcement‑learning framework that integrates reasoning, retrieval, and memory through a stack and fine‑grained action space. It uses hierarchical action‑aware rewards and an information‑aware trajectory rejection strategy to support long‑horizon learning. Experiments on multi‑hop, open‑domain, and agentic reasoning benchmarks show that AgenticRag‑R1 outperforms strong baselines and produces robust, interpretable, memory‑aware reasoning behaviors.
arXiv:2604. 10788v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) has emerged as a promising direction by extending Large Language Models' (LLMs) capabilities with external tools during reasoning.
Selection-Based Structured Reasoning (SSR) is a framework that replaces free-form reasoning with the selection of pre-specified natural‑language reasoning candidates, allowing multimodal agents to choose from a set of reusable high‑level reasoning traces. By scoring these candidates in parallel using a shared context KV cache, SSR eliminates the need for an auxiliary task head and reduces inference cost. Experiments on seven multimodal search benchmarks with 2B and 4B models show that SSR maintains competitive success rates while cutting per‑turn reasoning latency by over 90% and overall inference latency by 28–54%.