arXiv:2603. 03305v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate executable outputs, JSON objects, and API calls, where a single syntax error can make the output unusable.
arXiv:2609.06993v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly generate Markdown that is consumed by renderers, agents, code extractors, and structured downstream pipelin...
arXiv:2609.21509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When language models reason in chain-of-thought or exchange free-text intermediates, they serialize structured information into natural language. How m...
arXiv:2601.08626v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel at semantic understanding, yet their ability to reconstruct internal structure from scrambled inputs remains und...
arXiv:2607. 09999v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We show that post-training quantization can silently alter how large language models reason even when task accuracy is preserved.
arXiv:2607. 18261v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly used as transaction compilers: a user states an intent in natural language, and the model emits a structured object that an API can execute.
The paper investigates how the wording of schema‑key tokens can serve as an implicit instruction channel in constrained decoding for structured generation. By treating structured generation as a multi‑channel instruction problem, the authors analyze when an instructional advantage is preserved after grammar projection and conduct experiments on GSM8K and Math500 across seven language models. Results show that changing only the schema‑key wording can significantly alter accuracy, with both positive and negative effects, and that prompt‑level and schema‑level instructions interact non‑additively.
arXiv:2608. 12426v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed in settings that require simultaneous adherence to multiple explicit constraints - reasoning structure, safety boundaries, output schemas.
The paper introduces CodeRQ-Bench, the first benchmark for assessing large language model reasoning quality across coding tasks such as generation, summarization, and classification. It analyzes over a thousand mismatches from existing evaluators, identifies recurring limitations, and derives design insights that lead to a new two‑stage evaluator, VERA. Experiments show VERA outperforms strong baselines, improving AUCROC by up to 0.26 and AUPRC by up to 0.21 on four datasets.
arXiv:2609.23966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs can generate fluent descriptions from tables, but their outputs may remain logically unsupported by the structured data. We introduce STAT-TO-TEXT...
arXiv:2607. 20456v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models excel at code generation for mainstream programming languages but struggle with rare, domain-specific languages such as MiniZinc, a constraint modeling language for combinatorial problems.
arXiv:2606. 19857v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are commonly prompted and interfaced with human-readable natural language, even when the intended reader is another model.