arXiv AI

A Survey on the Linear Representation Hypothesis

arXiv AI
Sep 24

The Linear Representation Hypothesis Needs a Group Action

The paper argues that the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH) should not be treated as a single claim but as a family of claims differentiated by how representations are considered equivalent. It highlights that different equivalence notions preserve different structures, leading to metrics, probes, and interventions that may actually test distinct hypotheses. By formalizing these ideas with group actions, the authors provide a framework that clarifies how assumptions vary across metrics, reading points, and analysis stages, and they apply it to audit common representation quantities and recent interpretability analyses.

By Louie Hong Yao, Yuhao Li, Shengchao Liu
arXiv AI
Jun 15

Fodor and Pylyshyn's Systematicity Challenge Still Stands

arXiv:2606. 14512v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The recent successes of neural networks producing human-like language have caused significant stir in cognitive science, with many researchers arguing that classical puzzles about human cognition and challenges to artificial intelligence are being solved by neural networks.

By Michael Goodale, Salvador Mascarenhas