Text-to-image diffusion models expose many inference-time sampling parameters, including prompts, negative prompts, classifier-free guidance scales, and noise schedules. These parameters are typically manually chosen once and then held fixed across prompts and denoising timesteps, even though different prompts and stages of generation can benefit from different parameter values.
arXiv:2607. 23488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models expose many inference-time sampling parameters, including prompts, negative prompts, classifier-free guidance scales, and noise schedules.
arXiv:2607. 07693v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for aligning generative models with human preferences.
arXiv:2512. 09106v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion (Large) Language Models (dLLMs) now match the downstream performance of their autoregressive counterparts on many tasks, while holding the promise of being more efficient during inference.
arXiv:2608.23664v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reward fine-tuning is becoming an important tool for adapting diffusion models to human preferences and task-specific objectives, but existing method...
The paper introduces Learned End-to-End Guidance Schedules (LEEGS) for diffusion models, which train a time‑dependent guidance schedule to balance data quality and requirement satisfaction while reducing sampling steps. LEEGS minimizes the guidance function over a small set of examples using stochastic gradient descent and employs a gradient approximation to cut training time by a factor of four. Experiments on tasks such as image inpainting, noisy image inverse problems, face‑ID‑guided generation, and PDE problems show that LEEGS outperforms baselines at the same computational budget or matches constant guidance with only 10% of the steps.
arXiv:2603. 12893v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a standard technique for post-training diffusion-based image synthesis models, as it enables learning from reward signals to explicitly improve desirable aspects such as image quality and prompt alignment.
The paper introduces Optimizing Your Sampling (OYS), a method that treats diffusion model timestep selection as a black-box optimization problem and uses Bayesian optimization to directly improve the target metric. OYS outperforms default schedules and the Align Your Steps approach on text-to-image generation, inpainting, and other image tasks, as shown by both quantitative and human evaluations. It works without additional training, applies to distilled models, and enhances both simple and sophisticated samplers, achieving 89–94% of a 50‑step schedule’s quality with only 5 steps and a tenfold reduction in inference cost.
arXiv:2606. 15048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion models are typically trained with objectives that focus on local denoising targets at individual time steps (or adjacent pairs), which do not enforce consistency between predictions along the denoising trajectory.
The paper investigates training diffusion models to sample from distributions defined by unnormalized densities or energy functions. It benchmarks various diffusion-structured inference techniques, including simulation-based variational methods and off-policy approaches such as continuous generative flow networks, highlighting their relative strengths and challenging some prior claims. Additionally, the authors introduce a new exploration strategy for off-policy methods that employs local search in the target space with a replay buffer, demonstrating improved sample quality across multiple target distributions.
arXiv:2507. 08390v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Discrete diffusion models have recently emerged as strong alternatives to autoregressive language models, matching their performance through large-scale training.
Uniform discrete diffusion models (UDMs) typically rely on explicit time conditioning, yet this study finds that such conditioning is often unnecessary in practice. While the population‑optimal UDM predictor generally depends on time—controlling how much the model should trust the observed context—the dependence becomes negligible in finite‑data language settings. Empirical results show that trained language UDMs exhibit limited time sensitivity across most of the diffusion trajectory, and time‑agnostic predictors can match or outperform time‑conditioned models on various datasets and training objectives.
arXiv:2602. 08689v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion models generate samples through an iterative denoising process guided by a pretrained neural network.