arXiv:2603. 04689v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fair top-$k$ selection, which ensures appropriate proportional representation of members from minority or historically disadvantaged groups among the top-$k$ selected candidates, has drawn significant attention.
By Guangya Cai
arXiv:2609.07974v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Fairness in clustering has attracted sustained research interest, motivated by the need to ensure equitable representation of protected groups in mac...
By Kangke Cheng, Guanlin Mo, Shihong Song, Hu Ding
arXiv:2510.03899v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Balancing resource efficiency and fairness is critical in networked systems that support modern learning applications. We introduce the \emph...
By Lutz Oettershagen, Othon Michail
arXiv:2602.08589v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: PageRank (PR) is a fundamental algorithm in graph machine learning tasks. Owing to the increasing importance of algorithmic fairness, we consider t...
By Emmanouil Kariotakis, Aritra Konar
arXiv:2304. 13917v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In recent years, there has been a surge in effort to formalize notions of fairness in machine learning.
By Haris Aziz, Barton E. Lee, Sean Morota Chu, Jeremy Vollen
arXiv:2607. 18119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fair clustering aims to make cluster assignments independent of sensitive attributes, but this goal becomes challenging when multiple sensitive attributes jointly define many subgroups.
By Kyungseon Lee, Hankyo Jeong, Kunwoong Kim, Kwanho Lee, Yongdai Kim
arXiv:2606. 20461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning models have been shown to exhibit discriminatory outcomes or degraded performance for individuals at the intersection of multiple sensitive attributes, such as race and gender.
By Bruno Scarone, Alfredo Viola, Ren\'ee J. Miller
arXiv:2606. 04777v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clustering is increasingly used to support high-impact decisions, yet standard objectives such as $k$-means can produce clusterings that treat demographic groups unequally.
By Antonia Karra, Vasiliki Papanikou, Georgios Vardakas, Evaggelia Pitoura, Aristidis Likas
arXiv:2606. 00656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ensuring fair and equitable treatment across diverse groups, particularly in multi-class classification tasks, poses a significant challenge due to the persistent biases inherent in machine learning models.
By Li Zhang, Yuyuan Li, XiaoHua Feng, Jiaming Zhang, Fengyuan Yu, Chaochao Chen
arXiv:2601. 07144v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Ensuring fairness in matching algorithms is a key challenge in allocating scarce resources and positions.
By Linus Bleistein, Mathieu Dagr\'eou, Francisco Andrade, Thomas Boudou, Aur\'elien Bellet
The paper presents new algorithms for fair k‑center clustering in Euclidean spaces, where a dataset is divided into groups and each group has a limit on the number of centers that can be chosen. A parameterized approximation algorithm achieves a 2.732 ratio, which is improved to 2.414 with exponential time in k. By integrating this into a one‑pass streaming framework, the authors obtain streaming approximations of 4.464 (improvable to 3.828) and a polynomial‑time streaming algorithm with a 4.732 ratio, further reduced to 4.42, surpassing previous state‑of‑the‑art results. Experiments confirm that these methods outperform existing approaches in clustering accuracy.
By Zeyu Lin, Chaoqi Jia, Longkun Guo, Chao Chen
arXiv:2607. 23310v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study an online variant of discrete fair division under generalized assignment budget constraints.
By Saar Cohen, Nicholas Teh, Paul W. Goldberg, Michael J. Wooldridge