arXiv:2608. 19906v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurately ranking active ligands for a target protein pocket from massive chemical libraries remains a central challenge in virtual screening.
By Jia-Qi Lin, Yinghua Yao, Chang-Dong Wang, Yew-Soon Ong, Yuangang Pan
arXiv:2607. 24845v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been applied to sequential recommendation by formulating it as a natural language task.
By Harshini Kavuru, Dwipam Katariya, Giri Iyengar, Pranab Mohanty, Kalanand Mishra, Kalanand Mishra
arXiv:2609.05818v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We introduce ABLE, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents' ability to use biological AI models (BAIMs), such as ProteinMPNN and AlphaFold3, in dual-use...
By Bryce Cai, Geetha Jeyapragasan, Samira Nedungadi, Jake Yukich, Seth Donoughe
Protein language models (PLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for controllable biomolecular design, yet their post-training adaptation typically relies on costly wet-lab validation or curated preference datasets. To overcome this supervision bottleneck, we introduce unsupervised reward optimization of PLMs, a comprehensive framework for steerable protein generation without ground-truth labels.
arXiv:2606. 18961v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Protein language models (PLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for controllable biomolecular design, yet their post-training adaptation typically relies on costly wet-lab validation or curated preference datasets.
By Lanqing Li, Shentong Mo, Yang Yu, Pheng-Ann Heng
The paper presents a cost‑effective approach for industrial explainable‑recommendation systems by decoupling explanation generation from selection. Explanations are pre‑generated using six prompt styles and two commodity LLMs, then a lightweight CPU‑resident selector (e.g., LambdaRank) chooses the best one at request time, achieving sub‑100 ms latency without GPUs. Experiments on a 2,958‑pair Google Local subset and a 300‑pair MovieLens‑1M split show that pairwise ranking outperforms single‑action RL methods, while KG‑path selectors achieve near‑perfect unique‑output rates, and the overall end‑to‑end build cost is around $15 on commodity hardware.
arXiv:2608. 08189v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-driven program discovery relies on rapid evaluator feedback, but many scientific and engineering tasks require high-fidelity simulations, hardware execution, or physical experiments, making each evaluation expensive.
By Ximeng Liu, Qianlong Wang, Yingming Mao, Annan Li, Yatao Li, Shizhen Zhao, Jianmin Wu, Dawei Yin, Dou Shen
The paper presents a cost‑effective approach for industrial explainable‑recommendation systems by decoupling explanation generation from selection. Candidate explanations are pre‑generated using six prompt styles and two commodity LLMs, then a lightweight CPU‑resident selector (e.g., LambdaRank) chooses the best one at request time, achieving sub‑100 ms latency without GPUs. Experiments on a 2,958‑pair Google Local subset and a 300‑pair MovieLens‑1M split show that pairwise ranking methods outperform single‑action RL baselines, while KG‑path selectors achieve near‑perfect user satisfaction scores.
By Tanay Chowdhury, Saeideh Shahrokh Esfahani
arXiv:2609.24538v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Functional annotation of newly sequenced proteins remains a bottleneck in molecular biology: the number of sequences in public repositories grows far f...
By Demian Pavlyshenko, Bohdan Pavlyshenko
arXiv:2505. 20346v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Function-guided protein design is a crucial task with significant applications in drug discovery and enzyme engineering.
By Jiahao Kuang, Nuowei Liu, Jie Wang, Changzhi Sun, Tao Ji, Yuanbin Wu
arXiv:2607. 28658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated pre-training offers a way to train foundation models on private or distributed data without centralizing the underlying datasets.
By Claudia Grosser, Maike Heuer, Denis Krompass, Thomas A. Runkler
arXiv:2606. 04525v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Progress in genomic foundation models is difficult to assess due to fragmented benchmarks, incompatible evaluation protocols, and task-specific reporting.
By Daria Ledneva, Mikhail Nuridinov, Denis Kuznetsov