arXiv AI

MemeLogos: Knowledge-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for Harmful Meme Detection

arXiv AI
Aug 25

From Recognition to Reasoning: Advancing Multimodal Harmful Meme Detection via Chain-of-Thought Alignment

The paper introduces MemeMind, a large-scale dataset for detecting harmful memes that includes a detailed taxonomy and Chain-of-Thought reasoning annotations. It also proposes MemeGuard, a multimodal framework that uses a three-stage training strategy to improve visual understanding, reasoning, and discrimination of harmful content. Experiments show MemeGuard surpasses current state-of-the-art methods on MemeMind, advancing detection accuracy and interpretability.

By Hexiang Gu, Qifan Yu, Yuan Liu, Zikang Li, Saihui Hou, Jian Zhao, Zhaofeng He
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Learn Before You Judge: Progressive Knowledge-to-Decision Alignment for Explainable Hateful Meme Detection

The paper introduces ProKDA, a progressive knowledge-to-decision alignment framework for explainable hateful meme detection. ProKDA separates explanation generation and label prediction into three sequential training stages—background knowledge learning, hatefulness detection learning, and hatefulness boundary alignment—reducing task interference. Experiments on three public benchmarks demonstrate that ProKDA achieves state‑of‑the‑art detection performance while providing accurate, evidence‑supported explanations for moderation decisions.

By Bo Xu, Chenyuan Wang, Xinyu Chen, Quanhao Zhu, Rui Lin, Liang Zhao, Hongfei Lin, Feng Xia
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

MemeTAG: Keyword-Driven Meme Classification through Tag Embedding Reconstruction

MemeTAG introduces a dual‑objective framework for classifying harmful memes by combining keyword generation from a pretrained Vision‑Language Model with an Aggregated Tag Inference Network (ATIN) that condenses these keywords into a rich semantic embedding. The embedding is used as a target for an auxiliary reconstruction loss, encouraging deep alignment between visual and textual features. This approach, along with a three‑stage training strategy, achieves new state‑of‑the‑art results on the HarMeme, Hateful Memes Challenge, and PrideMM datasets.

By Akshit Sharma, Prashant W. Patil
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

AHA-Memes: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Benchmark for Understanding Hate in Arabic Memes

Hateful memes are a growing form of multimodal online harm, where hostile intent is often conveyed through the joint interpretation of images, text, cultural references, and implicit targets. While hateful meme detection has advanced in high-resource languages, Arabic remains underexplored, with existing meme resources focusing mainly on propaganda or coarse harmful-content labels.

arXiv AI
Sep 21

MemeLens: Multilingual Multitask VLMs for Memes

MemeLens is a unified multilingual, multitask Vision‑Language Model designed to improve meme understanding across a wide range of tasks such as hate, misogyny, propaganda, sentiment, and humour. The authors consolidated 38 public meme datasets, mapping their labels into a shared taxonomy of 20 tasks covering harm, targets, figurative intent, and affect, and conducted extensive experiments to show that multimodal training and a unified approach outperform fine‑tuning on individual datasets. All experimental resources, the model, and the datasets are released publicly for community use.

By Ali Ezzat Shahroor, Mohamed Bayan Kmainasi, Abul Hasnat, Dimitar Dimitrov, Giovanni Da San Martino, Preslav Nakov, Firoj Alam
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Vis-Poison: Poisoning Visual Knowledge in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Vis-Poison is a novel attack that poisons multimodal retrieval-augmented generation systems by inserting attacker-controlled images as visual evidence, without altering any textual metadata. The attack uses an automated multi-agent approach to create visually plausible poisoned images and has been tested on two multimodal RAG pipelines, four embedding models, and six generation models. In black-box settings, Vis-Poison achieves an end-to-end success rate between 40.16% and 65.40% against 30,000-entry knowledge bases, and remains effective against various multimodal large language models with an average success rate above 60%.

By Rujin Liang, Zhongpu Chen, Yuhao Lei, Xin Miao