The paper introduces Watch-Think-Interact (WTI), a closed-loop framework for multi-question streaming video reasoning that maintains compact natural-language memory entries linked to video time ranges. WTI decides whether to answer, continue watching, or recall relevant past intervals for each question, avoiding replay of the full history. The authors build a large dataset, WTI-82K, and a training method, Stream-GDPO, achieving state‑of‑the‑art performance on StreamingBench and OVO-Bench.
By Ziheng Huang, Yicheng Bao, Xueheng Li, Zhenkun Gao, Bangwei Liu, Kunquan Li, Yuxiang Shen, Bangyan Li, Xuejiao Wang, Changbo Wang, Gaoqi He
arXiv:2606. 16353v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Streaming video understanding models must answer queries at any moment during an ongoing stream, using only what they have observed so far and under fixed memory and computation budgets.
By Haonan Ge, Yiwei Wang, Hang Wu, Yujun Cai
TRACE (Temporal Audit and Condition-aware Evaluation) is a new benchmark and evaluation framework for streaming video understanding that explicitly records when evidence becomes valid, how visual history is maintained, and how responses are triggered. It combines temporally audited visual tasks, evidence timing, instruction-dependent trigger annotations, a unified causal Core–Adapter protocol, and multidimensional reporting of answer quality, timeliness, response-selection behavior, workload, completion, and reliability. Using 1,240 records from 517 videos, TRACE evaluated eight publicly available models in eight configurations, revealing that similar QA accuracy can hide significant differences in completion, answer validity, generation workload, and proactive performance metrics such as response delay, false alarms, and missed target windows.
By Yibo Ma, Qianqian Zhang, Peng Liu, Tiancheng Zhao
arXiv:2610.32132v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Proactive streaming video understanding requires assistants to track unfolding events and respond when a user's requested condition is met. To make t...
By Xueyun Tian, Bingbing Xu, Jiaming Liu, Jinpeng Yu, Yang Shi, Yu Zhao, Ruihua Huang, Yuanzhuo Wang, Huawei Shen
arXiv:2606. 17798v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the remarkable progress of Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs), current online architectures still struggle to simultaneously process continuous video streams, decide autonomously when to respond, and preserve long-horizon contextual memory.
By Zhenyu Yang, Kairui Zhang, Bing Wang, Shengsheng Qian, Changsheng Xu
Streaming video-language models must decide not only what to answer, but whether the evidence needed for the current question has arrived. Existing systems learn that decision as a separate trigger; w...
arXiv:2609.00291v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Streaming video understanding requires answering questions that arrive at arbitrary moments over an unbounded video stream. Existing systems primarily...
By Ce Zhang, Jing Bi, Jinxi He, Jianshu Zhang, Jingyang Lin, Yunzhong Xiao, Minghao Fu, Yaqi Xie, Zhentao Xie, Weicong Chen, Katia Sycara, Ming Zhou
arXiv:2606. 24477v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video large language models (LLMs) are often constrained by computation and memory budgets, leading them to use reduced frame rates and spatial resolutions, which may cause them to miss critical information for question answering (QA).
By Yixuan Li, Guangzhi Sun, Yudong Yang, Wei Li, Zejun MA, Chao Zhang
The paper investigates whether frozen video‑language models inherently encode a signal indicating whether sufficient evidence has been observed to answer a question. By training linear probes on seven byte‑identical models, the authors demonstrate that these models contain a readable evidence‑readiness signal with AUROC ranging from 0.733 to 0.905, even when the probe is trained without any footage from the benchmark family. The signal is question‑conditioned, remains robust when the model answers incorrectly, and outperforms traditional uncertainty estimators; it can be leveraged as a Readiness Gating policy that improves answer accuracy by up to 9.75 percentage points without extra computational cost.
By Dan Ben-Ami, Kobi Cohen, Chaim Baskin
FastBench is a new benchmark that tests streaming Video‑Large‑Language Models (VLMs) on high‑dynamic real‑world video streams, where events occur rapidly and cannot be captured by sparse 1–2 FPS sampling. The benchmark uses a trajectory‑grounded pipeline that generates QA pairs from high‑FPS clips, filters questions answerable at 2 FPS, verifies answers with SAM3 and CoTracker3 trajectories, and incorporates three rounds of human inspection, yielding 306 QA pairs across eight domains and multiple temporal scopes. Experiments show that even the strongest model, Gemini‑3.5‑Flash, achieves only 50.7 % accuracy, and that denser sampling improves performance but saturates when history is compressed; a training‑free baseline, ProactiveFrame, outperforms uniform sampling but still falls short of oracle‑guided focusing.
By Yuxuan Hu, Weikang Shi, Yang Bo, Xudong Lu, Xintong Guo, Shuhan Li, Yuyang He, Huankang Guan, Peiwen Sun, Yunqiao Yang, Wenbo Li, Rui Liu, Hongsheng Li
Tempo‑Zero is a self‑improvement framework for video reasoning that uses recursive self‑play in executable environments. It closes a loop of environment execution, self‑play verification, and environment evolution, allowing a single policy to act as both questioner and solver and to receive execution‑grounded rewards. The approach trains only on simple programs, without external video data or supervised fine‑tuning, and achieves superior performance on twelve real‑world video benchmarks, especially on temporal grounding tasks.
By Jingmin Zhu, Yanyan Zou, Xiuyu Li, James Bailey, Dinh Phung, Tao Yu, Yunyun Hou, Jun Liu, Jun Zhou, Sirui Wang, Nan Duan, Jiachen Liu, Qiuhong Ke
arXiv:2609.37559v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: To serve as real-world personal assistants, streaming video models need persistent memory that retains past experiences for later use. Yet existing str...
By Jianguo Huang, Jinming Liu, Qiyao Wang, Liang Xu, Jianhang Li, Zhimian Wen, Mingda Li, Shule Lu, Zhicheng Wang, Yuhan Guo, Xin Jin, Wenjun Zeng