The study investigates which components of a neural network contribute to rapid generalization (grokking) and how stable that improvement remains during further training. By transferring internal attention and MLP weights along with token embeddings and readout, the authors achieve a 5.46‑percentage‑point boost in early accuracy and a 558‑step reduction in confirmation latency, while also demonstrating that freezing transferred representations largely prevents post‑grokking relapse. The work delineates clear component‑level differences between acceleration and stability, and identifies architectural limits where omitting donor embeddings leads to significant performance loss.
arXiv:2606. 08635v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prefill-decode (PD) disaggregation decouples prompt processing from token generation, but it also turns the key-value (KV) cache into a network payload.
The paper investigates converting a large pretrained transformer (1.4 B parameters) into a smaller sibling (410 M) by studying representation alignment and parameter projection. It finds that dense weight projection destroys structure, and that a low‑budget, structure‑aware compensation—separating least‑squares function alignment from variance‑preserving rescaling—yields significant gains on token‑efficient training, outperforming subcloning and standard distillation pipelines at matched budgets.
arXiv:2608.30427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding speeds up generation with an efficient draft model (drafter) that proposes tokens for a target model to verify in one pass, pres...
arXiv:2607. 18553v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Can a language model read the quality of ongoing computation, and can an external intervention turn that readout into better outcomes?
arXiv:2603. 28921v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The critical damping condition of the damped harmonic oscillator model of SGD with momentum (Qian, 1999) yields a momentum schedule with no tuned hyperparameters: mu(t) = 1 - 2*sqrt(alpha(t)).
arXiv:2607. 09156v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Additive activation steering (injecting a scaled residual-stream direction during generation) is calibrated almost entirely in single-turn chat, yet the models it targets are increasingly deployed as tool-using ReAct agents.
arXiv:2605. 07284v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A late-layer change learned during post-training may work on the base model's earlier state, or it may depend on earlier computation learned with it.
arXiv:2608. 02829v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model families train every size from scratch.
The paper investigates whether sink-aware attention head selection remains valid after 4‑bit NF4 weight‑only post‑training quantization. Using Sink Topology Consistency metrics, it finds that global rank preservation stays high across Qwen2.5 and Llama‑3.2 models, yet top‑k head overlap drops to 61–79% and layer‑specific sink‑mass shifts can be substantial. The study also shows that cross‑domain calibration degrades more than within‑domain precision and that recalibration with a small number of samples can recover most of the stability, though full‑map stability may require updating more layers.
arXiv:2606. 00382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sequential fine-tuning of large language models forces a choice: let the shared substrate keep learning and accept catastrophic forgetting, or freeze it after task one and foreclose cross-task refinement.
arXiv:2608.21501v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Credit assignment in large-language-model reinforcement learning (LLM RL) can be separated into three objects: evidence about success, a transport oper...
The paper investigates selective on‑policy distillation, where a student model is trained only on token positions chosen by a selector. It demonstrates that the commonly used shared learning rate is not neutral: performance varies significantly with the learning rate for different selectors, leading to inconsistent comparisons. The authors attribute this selector‑rate entanglement to the selection process itself and recommend reporting the full arm‑by‑rate matrix for fair evaluation.