arXiv Computation and Language

Dual-Slot: From Serial Loops to Parallel Slots in Language Models

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

Contextual Correction of Parallel Draftsfor Speculative Decoding

The paper introduces DCOCO (DFlash Contextual Corrector), a lightweight mechanism that restores intra-block dependencies in speculative decoding by evaluating multiple candidate tokens for contextual compatibility across adjacent draft positions. DCOCO maintains parallel drafting while enabling contextually informed token selection at low additional cost. Across multiple verifier backbones and benchmarks, DCOCO achieves the highest average throughput, delivering speedups of up to 6.6× over vanilla decoding and outperforming competing methods by 6–23% under concurrent serving loads.

By Roy Eisenstadt, Harel Lidar, Tal Gonen, Omer Luxembourg, Itamar Zimerman, Lior Wolf, Eli David, Ilan Naiman
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Closing the Loop: Practical Training Recipes for Looped Language Models

The paper presents practical training recipes for looped language models, showing that a compute‑efficient pipeline can reduce the training budget from 7.7 T tokens to 310 B tokens while maintaining strong reasoning performance. In controlled experiments, a 1.4 B LoopLM outperforms a parameter‑matched dense model on 12 benchmarks, achieving significant gains on GSM8K, MATH, and DROP, and approaches a 3.9 B dense model at matched inference compute. The authors also provide a minimal recipe to convert pretrained dense models into looped ones, demonstrating improvements on Qwen3‑1.7B‑Base across multiple data regimes.

By Andrei Marchenko, Viacheslav Bezrukov, Oleg Kashurin, Inessa Fedorova, Dmitry Bocharov, Yuliana Shakhvalieva, Maria Tikhonova, Valerii Ternovskii
arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

LoopFold: Parallelizing Recurrent Depth in Looped Transformers

arXiv:2610.35556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped Transformers increase computation per token by repeatedly applying a shared backbone, offering a way to improve language modeling and downstream...

By Feichen Song, Boyi Zeng, Yiqin Hao, Shixiang Song, He Li, Yizhou Yang, Zitong Wang, Yifan Liu, Ziwei He, Zhouhan Lin
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 12

One Model to Loop Them All: Elastic Latent Recurrence for Language Models

The paper introduces Elastic Latent Recurrence (ELR), a training recipe that enables looped language models to match the accuracy of non-recurrent models at a single loop while allowing additional loops to improve accuracy with more compute. ELR achieves this through gated state updates with learned step sizes, mixed loop counts during training, and conditioning on loop index and budget. The method also reduces training and inference overhead in Mixture-of-Experts models and produces a single checkpoint, Koi‑4B, that performs competitively with state‑of‑the‑art models on multiple benchmarks.

By Faisal Ladhak, Shantanu Acharya, Santiago Akle Serano, Simeng Sun, Boris Ginsburg, Krishna C Puvvada
arXiv AI
Oct 21

Large Flow Language Models

arXiv:2610.28559v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continuous flow language models offer a path to parallel generation with tools for control and acceleration unavailable to discrete diffusion, yet ef...

By Arnav Chavan, Chanhyuk Lee, Udbhav Bamba, Jaehoon Yoo, Seunghoon Hong, Aditi Raghunathan, Jinwoo Kim
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

Structured Recurrent Mixers for Massively Parallelized Sequence Generation

arXiv:2605. 08696v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Over the last two decades, language modeling has experienced a shift from the use of predominantly recurrent architectures that process tokens sequentially during training and inference to non-recurrent models that process sequence elements in parallel during training, which results in greater training efficiency and stability at the expense of lower inference throughput.

By Benjamin L. Badger
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

WaveFront Decoding: Parallelized Self-Speculative Decoding for Looped Language Models

WaveFront Decoding (WFD) is a training‑free, self‑speculative decoding framework for looped language models that reduces decoding latency by batching draft and verification steps within the same recurrent‑block calls. By exploiting intermediate recurrence outputs as draft predictions and weight sharing to process token states at different depths together, WFD arranges mixed‑depth states into a diagonal wavefront, allowing shallow‑depth drafting while deeper‑depth verification proceeds concurrently. Experiments on six Spec‑Bench task categories show WFD achieving up to 4.81× speedup on Huginn‑3.5B compared to autoregressive decoding, outperforming traditional draft‑then‑verify approaches.

By Hyeongju Ha, Jae-Joon Kim