The paper introduces Narrative Consolidation, a new NLP task that aims to merge overlapping narrative documents—such as legal testimonies or historical accounts—into a single, chronologically coherent text, rather than merely compressing them. It defines the task, proposes an evaluation framework, and presents the Gospel Consolidation Language Resource, a benchmark built from the four Biblical Gospels with 169 canonical events and cross‑document alignments. Experiments show that providing an explicit temporal backbone dramatically improves performance, a simple length heuristic outperforms graph‑based methods, and temporal edges are the key discriminative signal.
arXiv:2606. 05724v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-form narrative QA requires reasoning over evolving story worlds rather than isolated passages: answers may depend on earlier goals, changing character states, social relations, causal triggers, temporal position, and later consequences.
arXiv:2605.27156v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge, particularly for long-tail do...
arXiv:2609.38799v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding multi-perspective alternative narratives requires identifying how their information agrees, conflicts, or differs across sources. Existin...
NS-ST-GraphRAG is a neuro‑symbolic spatio‑temporal GraphRAG framework designed to process long‑form literary narratives by integrating ontology‑guided extraction, deterministic constraint checking, dual temporal coordinates, spatial scene attributes, and dynamic sub‑graph retrieval. It selects the appropriate graph state based on the temporal and spatial scope of a query, grounding generated answers in traceable evidence. The authors also introduce Red‑Chamber‑QA, an open multi‑hop question‑answering benchmark for classical Chinese literature, and report that NS‑ST‑GraphRAG outperforms a frozen‑window baseline and a closed‑book model on a held‑out 120‑question split.
arXiv:2607. 09328v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Answering complex questions over long documents frequently requires integrating evidence that the source itself disperses naturally across distant passages.
arXiv:2607. 09328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Answering complex questions over long documents frequently requires integrating evidence that the source itself disperses naturally across distant passages.
This study tackles the challenge of identifying essay‑scale republication and reuse from fragmented text evidence, focusing on David Hume essays in eighteenth‑century books and newspapers. It compares a staged rule‑based workflow, baseline decision‑tree and LLM approaches, and automated rule adaptation, finding that pair‑level feature aggregation achieves high F1 scores and that the final workflow offers the best precision‑recall balance. Manual audits confirm all predicted positives as genuine republications, demonstrating the method’s effectiveness in producing compact, auditable candidate sets for historical analysis.
arXiv:2607. 05577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-form fiction writers need memory that answers multi-hop questions about evolving story state: who knows a secret and when they learned it, whether an event preceded the narration that revealed it, whether a setup paid off, and how a relationship shifted.
arXiv:2609.00241v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long documents often distribute important information across extensive narrative passages and multiple tables, making faithful summarization particular...
arXiv:2609.38406v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Access to real-world information is often noisy and fragmented. Constructing a coherent narrative from such fragments requires models to reconstruct mi...
The paper introduces a three-tier evaluation framework—recovery, mining, and discovery—for unsupervised narrative label generation in disinformation datasets. It compares clustering-based and graph-community-based pipelines across seven datasets, finding that clustering can underrepresent prominent topics while graph methods produce many singletons that human annotators recognize as valid narratives. The authors release human-validated narrative candidate labels for the Climate Obstruction and PolyNarrative datasets to aid taxonomy development and dataset expansion.
The paper presents a detailed examination of narrative elements—agency, setting, and events—within the Dolma web-scale pretraining corpus. Using a framework of 11 interpretable dimensions, the authors hand‑annotated 400 passages, expanded this to a 25,000‑passage LLM‑labeled dataset, and trained NarraBERT models to predict narrative features across 13 million passages, producing the NarraDolma dataset. The study reveals that narrative structure is measurable at scale and that narrative qualities vary unevenly across different data sources, topics, and formats, highlighting gaps in current data curation practices.