arXiv:2608.28833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large language models (LLMs) incorporate user personalization signals to improve usability and helpfulness, they increasingly shift from providin...
The study examined how personalising language models affects user interactions over five days, comparing a non‑personalised baseline with memory‑based and survey‑based personalisation. Results showed that many interaction changes were due to repeated exposure, but personalisation influenced specific behaviors: memory‑based users disclosed more and found the model less creepy, while survey‑based users felt more regret about sharing personal data. The authors emphasize the nuanced, approach‑specific impacts on user attitudes and the need for careful design of personalised AI.
The paper introduces a three-tier persona vector for user simulation in evaluating LLM agents, comprising 23 dimensions across demographics, behavioral traits, and emotional states, plus a query-complexity overlay. It demonstrates that these nuanced personas generate diverse, scenario-reactive conversations, leading to significant variations in agent goal achievement and compliance across different contexts. The model’s design allows for reproducible, auditable user behavior patterns without relying on learned covariance matrices.
arXiv:2601. 11049v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We examine whether large language models (LLMs) can predict biased decision-making in conversational settings, and whether their predictions capture not only human cognitive biases but also how those effects change under cognitive load.
arXiv:2607. 27056v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalized agents are increasingly applied to assist users across a wide range of tasks.
The paper investigates Self‑Generated Text Recognition (SGTR), the ability of large language models (LLMs) to identify their own outputs. By evaluating 13–21 models across 6 experimental designs, it shows that SGTR accuracy varies with evaluation format, conversation structure, and task domain, and that a quality‑heuristic bias dominates results. The study also finds that fine‑tuning for SGTR in one setting can generalize to others and may cause models to prefer their own outputs when judging, highlighting potential safety concerns.
arXiv:2510. 22170v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Persona conditioning is widely used to steer large language model (LLM) behavior, but it is unclear whether it induces stable behavioral structure or superficial variation.
The paper presents a systematic MBTI analysis of open‑source large language models (LLMs) across various quantization levels, including mainstream 4‑bit and extreme 2‑bit settings. It examines how personality traits emerge layer‑by‑layer through entropy and confidence‑gap dynamics, and introduces Uncertainty‑Amplified Layer Decoding (UALD) to study decoding‑induced personality drift. Findings show that personality is not static but depends on layer, quantization, prompting, and decoding, with ENFJ traits dominating, 4‑bit quantization preserving coarse structure, and 2‑bit quantization disrupting fine‑grained consistency.
The paper introduces a three-tier persona vector to generate diverse, realistic user inputs for evaluating tool-augmented LLM agents. The vector includes 23 dimensions: categorical demographics, continuous behavioral traits, and continuous emotional states, plus a query-complexity overlay. Experiments on 64,698 conversations show that these persona dimensions produce measurable differences in agent performance and realistic scenario-reactive behavior.
The study investigates how the visibility of speaker biographies to interlocutors during training, inference, and evaluation affects persona-based dialogue generation. It finds that training-time visibility is the primary factor determining whether models express persona traits or simply copy biographical text, and that providing interlocutor-biography visibility during training reduces target-biography copying. Additionally, asymmetric disclosure—where only the interlocutor sees the target biography—leads to more frequent leakage of target content into interlocutor turns, making such dialogues easier for a judge to identify.
arXiv:2607. 26473v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual users is essential for improving user experience, yet existing approaches typically rely on explicit preference supervision such as pairwise comparisons or demographic attributes, limiting their applicability in natural interaction settings.
arXiv:2608. 11354v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern recommender systems treat observed actions as reliable proxies for user preferences, yet interactions often reflect exploration or comparison rather than stable preference expression.