arXiv AI

Locality-Aware Redundancy Pruning for LLM Depth Compression

arXiv:2605. 27786v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models are known to contain representational redundancy across network depth, making depth pruning an effective approach for improving inference efficiency.

arXiv AI
Sep 11

Forward-Free LLM Depth Pruning via Weight Redundancy

The paper introduces Weight-Redundancy Pruning (WRP), a forward‑free depth‑pruning technique for large language models that estimates inter‑layer redundancy using only checkpoint weights. WRP compares attention outputs and MLP down‑projection weights across layers, combining pairwise similarities with relative projection‑scale information to guide layer grouping and block selection. Experiments show that WRP consistently outperforms existing forward‑free magnitude pruning methods and approaches the performance of activation‑based pruning across various pruning settings, model families, and downstream tasks.

By Vincent-Daniel Yun, Woosang Lim
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 10

Prune Once: Retraining-Free Task-Agnostic Pruning for Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2608. 06901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable generalization across diverse multimodal tasks through large-scale pre-training, yet their rapidly increasing computational and memory requirements pose significant challenges for deployment in constrained environments.

By Minseok Kang, Hyunwoo Kim, Chanyoung Kim, Minwoo Kim, Jaekoo Lee, Dahuin Jung
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

SHIFT-LLM: Distribution Shift Correction in Depth-Pruned LLMs

SHIFT-LLM is a training‑free post‑pruning correction framework that inserts a Linear Residual Adapter (LRA) at each depth‑pruned site in large language models. Each LRA preserves the original residual identity while adding a lightweight affine correction calibrated via closed‑form least‑squares regression on a small held‑out set, thereby approximating the hidden state that would have been produced by the removed block. Experiments across multiple model families and benchmarks show that SHIFT‑LLM consistently recovers accuracy lost to depth pruning, achieving gains up to +15.7 points on Llama‑3.1‑8B‑Instruct with only a few hundred calibration samples and no gradient computation.

By Ali Bahri, Hang Li, Hongliang Li, Zhitang Chen
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Pruning Laws for Large Language Models

arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...

By Ayan Sengupta, Siddhant Chaudhary, Tanmoy Chakraborty
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Ghosted Layers: Unconstrained Activation Alignment for Recovering Layer-Pruned LLMs

arXiv:2605. 15491v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Layer pruning removes entire Transformer decoder blocks from large language models, but introduces a mismatch between the hidden state received by the next surviving layer and the distribution it was trained to process, leading to significant performance degradation.

By Vincent-Daniel Yun, Junhyuk Jo, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Sunwoo Lee
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

NIRVANA: Structured Pruning Reimagined for Large Language Model Compression

arXiv:2509. 14230v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While structured pruning presents a highly effective pathway for accelerating Large Language Model (LLM) inference, existing methods frequently suffer from significant performance degradation and demand computationally retraining to recover capabilities.

By Mengting Ai, Tianxin Wei, Sirui Chen, Jingrui He
arXiv AI
Sep 10

FastE: Readout-Triggered Token Compression for LLM Embedding Inference

FastE is a training‑free, plug‑and‑play method that compresses token prefixes in large language model (LLM) embedding inference. It uses a shared fixed threshold on batch‑mean readout‑prefix alignment to decide when to compress and ranks prefix states by readout attention scores to keep the most important ones. Experiments on Qwen3‑Embedding models show that FastE can cut decoder‑backbone FLOPs by over 40% while preserving more than 99% of the original ranking quality across multiple benchmarks and tasks.

By Jinsong Shu, Jinyong Wen, Baokun Wang, Zhongle Xie, Lidan Shou, Weiqiang Wang, Gang Chen